Effect of number of stimuli on auditory reaction time in healthy subjects of Bhavnagar region

被引:0
|
作者
Ghuntla, Tejas P. [1 ]
Mehta, Hemant B. [1 ]
Gokhale, Pradnya A. [1 ]
Shah, Chinmay J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Med Coll, Dept Physiol, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
关键词
Auditory; Choice; Reaction time; Simple; Stimuli;
D O I
10.4103/0971-7749.124510
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Present study aimed to see effect of number of stimuli on auditory reaction time. Reaction is purposeful voluntary response to different stimuli as auditory stimuli. Auditory reaction time is time required to response to auditory stimuli. Materials and Methods: The auditory reaction time was measured by the reaction time instrument in subjects. Simple reaction time and choice reaction time measured. During the reaction time testing, auditory stimuli were given for three times and minimum reaction time was taken as the final reaction time for that sensory modality of that subject. The results were statistically analyzed and were recorded as mean standard deviation and Students paired t-test was applied to check the level of significance. Results and Conclusion: The study shows that simple auditory reaction time is less than choice auditory reaction time. Mental processes are involved in identification of stimulus, response selection, and programming and this takes certain time. Response to stimuli would be faster if number of stimuli is lesser in number. In routine life, many works done on information of auditory stimuli. Person should be careful while driving in talking with others or in mobiles. Training reduces reaction time. In medical examination, there are identification of instruments, graphs, bones, and viva questions as well. Student can practice and decrease mental processing time for identification of all this and can respond quickly.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 181
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender Differences in the Effect of Auditory Stimuli on Ventricular Repolarization in Healthy Subjects
    Nakagawa, Mikiko
    Sekine, Yasuko
    Ono, Mari
    Taniguchi, Yayoi
    Takahashi, Naohiko
    Yonemochi, Hidetoshi
    Saikawa, Tetsunori
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (06) : 653 - 657
  • [2] The mismatch negativity for duration decrement of auditory stimuli in healthy subjects
    Joutsiniemi, SL
    Ilvonen, T
    Sinkkonen, J
    Huotilainen, M
    Tervaniemi, M
    Lehtokoski, A
    Rinne, T
    Näätänen, R
    EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 108 (02): : 154 - 159
  • [3] Effects of redundant auditory stimuli on reaction time
    Hannes Schröter
    Rolf Ulrich
    Jeff Miller
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 39 - 44
  • [4] Effects of redundant auditory stimuli on reaction time
    Schroeter, Hannes
    Ulrich, Rolf
    Miller, Jeff
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [5] ORIENTATIONAL REACTION TO DIFFERENT STIMULI IN HEALTHY AND NEUROTIC SUBJECTS
    ZIKMUND, V
    ACTIVITAS NERVOSA SUPERIOR, 1967, 9 (03): : 319 - &
  • [6] EFFECT OF AUDITORY STIMULI ON STRESS INDUCED BY PAINFUL STIMULI IN HUMAN SUBJECTS
    GREER, JR
    JENNETT, SM
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1966, 187 (02): : P20 - &
  • [7] Auditory reaction time in patients with epilepsy and healthy controls auditory reaction time in patients with epilepsy and healthy controls
    Schwab, N.
    Renzel, R.
    Faber, P.
    Capaul, M.
    Imbach, L.
    Ledergerber, D.
    EPILEPSIA, 2024, 65 : 144 - 144
  • [8] DURATION EFFECT IN REACTION-TIME TO THE OFFSET OF BRIEF AUDITORY-STIMULI
    ROWLAND, EL
    EMMERICH, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 91 (04): : 645 - 650
  • [9] The auditory redundant signals effect: An influence of number of stimuli or number of percepts?
    Schroeter, Hannes
    Frei, Luisa S.
    Ulrich, Rolf
    Miller, Jeff
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2009, 71 (06) : 1375 - 1384
  • [10] The auditory redundant signals effect: An influence of number of stimuli or number of percepts?
    Hannes Schröter
    Luisa S. Frei
    Rolf Ulrich
    Jeff Miller
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2009, 71 : 1375 - 1384