Features of analysis of main pipelines seismic resistance

被引:0
|
作者
Makhutov, Nikolay A. [1 ,2 ]
Chernyavsky, Alexander O. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Transneft R&D LLC, Pipeline Transport Inst LLC, 47a Sevastopolsky Prospect, Moscow 117186, Russia
[2] RAS, MERI, 4 Maly Kharitonyevsky Pereulok, Moscow 101990, Russia
[3] Natl Res Univ, South Ural State Univ, 76 Lenin Prospect, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
[4] Russian Acad Sci, Ural Branch, Sci & Engn Ctr Reliabil & Safety Large Syst & Mac, 54a Studencheskaya Str, Ekaterinburg 620049, Russia
关键词
pipeline; seismic capacity; finite elements method;
D O I
10.28999/2541-9595-2018-8-4-377-383
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The problems of stress analysis in main underground pipelines under seismic action are considered. It is shown that the bending stresses arising in the pipeline during the passage of a seismic wave are small and should not entail dangerous consequences for it (except for areas with high local stresses: surroundings of defects, bends, T-pipe). A significant danger is represented by large soil movements, which can occur in zones of tectonic faults. In these cases, the soil displacement can be estimated at meters, which should lead to high stresses. To analyze the stresses arising in a pipe in a soil movement zone, the finite element method implemented in the LS-DYNA program was used. It is shown that taking large deformations into account when using Lagrange's formulation requires the exclusion of some of the elements from the model during the calculation and leads to errors that do not go to the safety factor. The combined approach (the Lagrange approach for a pipe whose deformations are not too large and the Euler approach for the soil) is free of this shortcoming and provides an opportunity to analyze the consequences of large soil displacements. A fully parameterized model is developed that allows to make calculations on comparison of the effectiveness of various measures with a minimum labor input from the developer: changes in the profile of the trench (which is particularly important for horizontal displacements), properties and thickness of the backfill layer, properties and wall thickness of the pipe material. As one of the non-standard methods to ensure safety, the use of pipes with ribs is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 383
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic analysis of buried pipelines
    Owens, FC
    OPTIMIZING POST-EARTHQUAKE LIFELINE SYSTEM RELIABILITY, 1999, (16): : 130 - 139
  • [2] Wave Theory of Seismic Resistance of Underground Pipelines
    Sultanov, Karim Sultanovich
    Vatin, Nikolai Ivanovich
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (04): : 1 - 28
  • [3] Complex strength analysis of main pipelines
    Neganov, Dmitry A.
    NAUKA I TEHNOLOGII TRUBOPROVODNOGO TRANSPORTA NEFTI I NEFTEPRODUKTOV-SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGIES-OIL AND OIL PRODUCTS PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION, 2019, 9 (02): : 128 - 136
  • [4] SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS OF BURIED PIPELINES
    MASHALY, ESA
    DATTA, TK
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1989, 115 (03): : 232 - 252
  • [5] Seismic risk analysis of concrete pipelines
    Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc, Arlington, United States
    Tech Council Lifeline Earthquake Eng Monogr, 16 (401-413):
  • [6] Uplift Resistance of Long Pipelines in the Presence of Seismic Forces
    Chakraborty, Debarghya
    Kumar, Jyant
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2014, 5 (04)
  • [7] Seismic risk analysis of concrete pipelines
    Rao, RS
    Zarghamee, MS
    OPTIMIZING POST-EARTHQUAKE LIFELINE SYSTEM RELIABILITY, 1999, (16): : 401 - 413
  • [8] Seismic resistance of buried safety-related pipelines
    Masopust, R
    STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 1197 - 1202
  • [9] Seismic Analysis of Connections of Buried Continuous Pipelines
    Liu, Wei
    Huang, Chunjie
    Wang, Yunchang
    Shi, Peixin
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [10] An Observational Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability of Industrial Pipelines
    Lanzano, Giovanni
    Salzano, Ernesto
    de Magistris, Filippo Santucci
    Fabbrocino, Giovanni
    CISAP5: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS & POWER INDUSTRY, PT 1, 2012, 26 : 567 - 572