DRAINAGE AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL

被引:0
|
作者
ALARFAJ, AL [1 ]
SHAHAB, K [1 ]
ALGHASSAB, G [1 ]
ALBREIKI, H [1 ]
ALSHAWAN, S [1 ]
AZAB, A [1 ]
机构
[1] KING FAISAL UNIV,DEPT SURG,DAMMAM,SAUDI ARABIA
关键词
CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DRAINAGE; ATELECTASIS; WOUND INFECTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This prospective clinical study was done to assess the efficacy of postcholecystectomy drainage. A total of 173 cholecystectomized patients were randomized into two groups; group A (86 patients) without drainage and group B (87 patients) with drainage. Group B included two types of patients; B1 (52 patients) with suction drain and B2 (35 patients) with gravity drain. Evidence of wound infection, chest complications, and duration of hospital stay were recorded in every case. Ninety five patients were assessed for chest complications and subhepatic collection by chest x-ray and abdominal ultrasonography. In group B patients the total amount of fluid drained was measured. The results were analysed by appropriate statistical methods. There was no significant difference in the mte of wound infection or atelectasis in either group, although there was apparent increase of lung complications and subhepatic collections in Group B1. The average postoperative hospital stay was significantly increased in group B patients. Considering all the parameters of this study, ft was found that drainage with gravity was attended with the least morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 276
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS SAFER WITHOUT DRAINAGE - THE RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    MONSON, JRT
    GUILLOU, PJ
    KEANE, FBV
    TANNER, WA
    BRENNAN, TG
    SURGERY, 1991, 109 (06) : 740 - 746
  • [2] DRAINAGE AFTER THYROIDECTOMY - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    PEIX, JL
    TEBOUL, F
    FELDMAN, H
    MASSARD, JL
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 1992, 77 (02) : 122 - 124
  • [3] ELECTIVE CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT SUBHEPATIC DRAINAGE - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    KUPCZYKJOERIS, D
    SCHUMPELICK, V
    TOENS, C
    TRUONG, S
    GOLTZ, I
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1991, 116 (20): : 1187 - 1193
  • [4] A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF 2 DRAINAGE METHODS AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    FRASER, I
    EVERSON, NW
    NASH, JR
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1982, 64 (03) : 183 - 185
  • [5] CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITHOUT DRAINAGE - A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    LATIF, AA
    HUSSAIN, SA
    CHOUDHARY, A
    ALSAIGH, A
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 1989, 9 (01) : 36 - 38
  • [6] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF CHEST DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
    GRAHAM, ANJ
    COSGROVE, AP
    GIBBONS, JRP
    MCGUIGAN, JA
    THORAX, 1992, 47 (06) : 461 - 462
  • [7] Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    Tani, Masaji
    Kawai, Manabu
    Terasawa, Hiroshi
    Hama, Takashi
    Yamaue, Hiroki
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2007, 14 (06): : 551 - 556
  • [8] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF CHEST DRAINAGE SYSTEMS - REPLY
    GRAHAM, ANJ
    MCGUIGAN, JA
    THORAX, 1992, 47 (12) : 1086 - 1086
  • [9] NEEDLE DRAINAGE OF SUBRETINAL FLUID - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    BURTON, RL
    CAIRNS, JD
    CAMPBELL, WG
    HERIOT, WJ
    HEINZE, JB
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 1993, 13 (01): : 13 - 16
  • [10] SUCTION DRAINAGE OF THE GALLBLADDER BED DOES NOT PREVENT COMPLICATIONS AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A RANDOM CONTROL CLINICAL-TRIAL
    PLAYFORTH, MJ
    SAUVEN, P
    EVANS, M
    POLLOCK, AV
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (04) : 269 - 271