Risk modeling for ventricular assist device support in post-cardiotomy shock

被引:3
|
作者
Alsoufi, Bahaaldin [1 ,2 ]
Rao, Vivek [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Augustine [1 ,2 ]
Maganti, Manjula [1 ,2 ]
Cusimano, Robert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jsha.2012.02.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Post-cardiotomy shock (PCS) has a complex etiology. Although treatment with inotrops and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support improves cardiac performance, end-organ injuries are common and lead to prolonged ICU stay, extended hospitalization and increased mortality. Early consideration of mechanical circulatory support may prevent such complications and improve outcome. Methods: Between January 1997 and January 2002, 321 patients required IABP and inotropic support for PCS following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution. Perioperative variables including age, mixed venous saturation (MVO2), inotropic requirements and LV function were analyzed using multivariate statistical methods. All explanatory variables with a univariate p value <0.10 were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to predict hospital mortality. Odds ratios from significant variables (p < 0.05) in the regression model were used to compose a risk score. Results: Overall hospital mortality was 16%. The independent risk factors for mortality in this population were: MVO2 < 60% (OR = 3.2), milrinone > 0.5 mu g/kg/min (OR = 3.2), age > 75 (OR = 2.7), adrenaline > 0.1 mu g/kg/min (OR = 1.5). A 15-point risk score was developed based on the regression model. Hospital mortality in patients with a score > 6 was 46% (n = 13/28), 3-6 was 31% (n = 9/29) and <3 was 11% (n = 29/264). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients with PCS continue to face high mortality despite IABP and inotropic support. Advanced age, heavy inotropic dependency and poor oxygen delivery all predicted increased risk for death. Further investigation is needed to assess whether early institution of VAD support could improve outcome in this high-risk group of patients. (C) 2012 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 72
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Levitronix ventricular assist device as a bridge-to-recovery for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Clough, Rachel E.
    Vallely, Michael P.
    Henein, Michael Y.
    Pepper, John R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 134 (03) : 408 - 409
  • [2] Comparison of temporary ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal life support in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Koch, Achim
    Binu, Raj
    Padukone, Ashok
    Kaul, Sundip
    Maunz, Olaf
    Garcia-Saez, Diana
    Zych, Bartlomiej
    Husain, Mubassher
    De Robertis, Fabio
    Popov, Aron-Frederik
    Simon, Andre R.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : 863 - 869
  • [3] Ventricular assist device therapy in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: historical outcomes and current trends
    Nasir, Abdul
    Bonde, Pramod
    Graham, Alastair N. J.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 14 (05) : 585 - 587
  • [4] Short-term ventricular assist device in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: factors influencing survival
    Prashant N. Mohite
    Anton Sabashnikov
    Nikhil P. Patil
    Diana García Sáez
    Bartlomiej Zych
    Aron F. Popov
    Alexander Weymann
    Thorsten Wahlers
    Nandor Marczin
    Fabio DeRobertis
    Toufan Bahrami
    Mohamed Amrani
    André R. Simon
    Journal of Artificial Organs, 2014, 17 : 228 - 235
  • [5] Short-term ventricular assist device in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: factors influencing survival
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Patil, Nikhil P.
    Saez, Diana Garcia
    Zych, Bartlomiej
    Popov, Aron F.
    Weymann, Alexander
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    Marczin, Nandor
    DeRobertis, Fabio
    Bahrami, Toufan
    Amrani, Mohamed
    Simon, Andre R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2014, 17 (03) : 228 - 235
  • [6] RESUMPTION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION FOLLOWING PROFOUND POST-CARDIOTOMY FAILURE WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE SUPPORT - CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
    JOHNSON, MD
    IGO, SR
    FUQUA, JM
    HIBBS, CW
    TRONO, R
    EDMONDS, CH
    BRAGG, DA
    LANDE, AJ
    BENNETT, JG
    NORMAN, JC
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1976, 24 (04): : A518 - A518
  • [7] Extracorporeal life support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a systematic review
    Charlesworth, M.
    Venkateswaran, R.
    Barnard, J.
    Barker, J.
    Feddy, L.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 : 32 - 32
  • [8] Post-cardiotomy Shock Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Chen, Martin
    Evans, Adam
    Gutsche, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 2094 - 2095
  • [9] PATHOLOGIC FINDINGS IN POST-CARDIOTOMY PATIENTS MANAGED WITH A TEMPORARY LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST PUMP
    SCHOEN, FJ
    BERNHARD, WF
    KHURI, SF
    KOSTER, JK
    VANDEVANTER, SJ
    WEINTRAUB, RM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 143 (04): : 508 - 514
  • [10] SUCCESSFUL POST-CARDIOTOMY EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATORY ASSIST WITH CENTRIFUGAL PUMP
    JAKOB, H
    MAASS, D
    PALZER, B
    OELERT, H
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1987, 372 : 627 - 632