Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes between the medical and surgical treatments in tubal ectopi pregnancy

被引:1
|
作者
Yousefnezhad, Azadeh [1 ]
Pirdehghan, Azar [2 ]
Rad, Mahboubeh Roshandel [3 ]
Eskandari, Aemeh [3 ]
Ahmadi, Shahnaz [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Emam Khomaini Hosp, Tehran, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Community Med, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Shafa Hosp, Rasht, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firouzabadi Hosp, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Ectopic pregnancy; Medical treatment; Surgical treatment; Fertility; Infertility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Various treatments have been proposed to treat ectopic pregnancy, but their impact on future pregnancies is still the subject of controversy. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the medical and surgical treatment methods and their impact on the subsequent fertility results and complications in women with a history of ectopic pregnancy. Materials and Methods: In this analytical, cross-sectional study, 370 women with the history of ectopic pregnancy, (treared with single dose of methotrexate or salpingectomy by laparotomy), that referred to Al-Zahra Hospital, Rasht, Guilan between 2009 to 2013 were enrolled. 147 women responded to the phone call. The age, the number of women that needed to drug for pregnancy, fertility rate and the fertility outcomes were studied. Result: 147 women responded to the call and between them, 114 women tried to get pregnant again after the ectopic pregnancy treatment. They were agreed to the participate in the study. The mean age of the patients was 28.56 +/- 5.63 yr. The fertility rates in the medical and the surgical groups were 56.6% and 47.61%, respectively (p=0.141). There were no significant differences in the poor consequences of pregnancy among the two groups; ectopic pregnancy (p=0.605), miscarriage (p=0.605), and prematuredelivery (p=0.648). 15.1% in the medicinal group and two patients 12.5% in the surgical group had received fertility treatment in order to get pregnant (p=0.135). There was no significant difference in two groups. Conclusion: It seems that surgical treatment depending on the underlying variables of each patient, can be used such as medical treatment, without worrying about its effect on fertility.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 34
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FERTILITY OUTCOMES AFTER MEDICAL AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF TUBAL ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
    Duz, Senem Arda
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2021, 60 (03) : 347 - 353
  • [2] Laparoscopy-aided medical or surgical treatment for tubal pregnancy
    Li, Yiu-Tai
    Pan, Chuan-chien
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (04) : 832 - 832
  • [4] Medical management of tubal pregnancy
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (06): : B1 - B7
  • [5] Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a comparison of surgical outcomes
    Yoon, Bo Sung
    Park, Hyun
    Seong, Seok Ju
    Park, Chong Taik
    Jun, Hye Sun
    Kim, In Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 159 (01) : 190 - 193
  • [6] CONSERVATIVE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY WITH TUBAL RECONSTRUCTION
    STANGEL, JJ
    REYNIAK, JV
    STONE, ML
    SURGICAL FORUM, 1977, 28 : 577 - 578
  • [7] SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY
    MAHEUX, R
    DECHERNEY, AH
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1984, 2 (02): : 175 - 185
  • [8] CONSERVATIVE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY
    STANGEL, JJ
    REYNIAK, JV
    STONE, ML
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 48 (02): : 241 - 244
  • [9] Comparison of Conservative and Surgical Treatments in Symptomatic Pregnancy Hydronephrosis
    Demir, Mehmet
    Yagmur, Ismail
    Pelit, Eyyup Sabri
    Kati, Bulent
    Tuncekin, Adem
    Ciftci, Halil
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (11-12) : 1085 - 1091
  • [10] Comparison of groups with medical and surgical terminations of pregnancy
    Pojarova, M.
    Sehnal, B.
    Jarolimkova, A.
    Neumannova, H.
    Zikan, M.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 83 (04): : 244 - 249