Assessment of Item-Writing Flaws in Multiple-Choice Questions

被引：22

作者：

Nedeau-Cayo, Rosemarie ^{[1
]}

Laughlin, Deborah ^{[2
]}

Rus, Linda ^{[2
]}

Hall, John ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Bronson Methodist Hosp, 601 John St,Box 44, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA

[2] Bronson Methodist Hosp, Educ Serv Instructor, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA

来源：

JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT | 2013年 / 29卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1097/NND.0b013e318286c2f1

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

This study evaluated the quality of multiple-choice questions used in a hospital's e-learning system. Constructing well-written questions is fraught with difficulty, and item-writing flaws are common. Study results revealed that most items contained flaws and were written at the knowledge/comprehension level. Few items had linked objectives, and no association was found between the presence of objectives and flaws. Recommendations include education for writing test questions.

引用

页码：52 / 57

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] Crowdsourcing the Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions Using Item-Writing Flaws and Bloom's Taxonomy
Moore, Steven
Fang, Ellen
Nguyen, Huy A.
Stamper, John
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING @ SCALE, L@S 2023, 2023, : 25 - 34
[2] A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment
Haladyna, TM
Downing, SM
Rodriguez, MC
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2002, 15 (03) : 309 - 334
[3] Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments
Tarrant, Marie
Ware, James
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (02) : 198 - 206
[4] ASSESSING INTER-RATER AGREEMENT ABOUT ITEM-WRITING FLAWS IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS OF CLINICAL ANATOMY
Guimaraes, B.
Pais, J.
Coelho, E.
Silva, A.
Povo, A.
Lourinho, I.
Severo, M.
Ferreira, M. A.
EDULEARN13: 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, : 5921 - 5924
[5] ADAPTING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEM-WRITING GUIDELINES TO AN INDUSTRIAL CONTEXT
Foster, Robert Michael
ICEIS 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL 4: SOFTWARE AGENTS AND INTERNET COMPUTING, 2010, : 71 - 74
[6] Evaluation of five guidelines for option development in multiple-choice item-writing
Martinez, Rafael J.
Moreno, Rafael
Martin, Irene
Trigo, M. Eva
PSICOTHEMA, 2009, 21 (02) : 326 - 330
[7] The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments
Tarrant, Marie
Knierim, Aimee
Hayes, Sasha K.
Ware, James
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2006, 26 (08) : 662 - 671
[8] Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws
Kowash, Mawlood
Alhobeira, Hazza
Hussein, Iyad
Al Halabi, Manal
Khan, Saif
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2020, 25 (01):
[9] Writing Multiple-Choice Questions
Boland, Robert J.
Lester, Natalie A.
Williams, Eric
ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 34 (04) : 310 - 316
[10] Construct-irrelevant variance and flawed test questions: Do multiple-choice item-writing principles make any difference?
Downing, SM
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (10) : S103 - S104

← 1 2 3 4 5 →