Risk Allocation in Retirement Plans: A Better Solution

被引:0
|
作者
Fuerst, Donald E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mercer Human Resource Consulting, New York, NY 10036 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00077.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The corporate world is reconsidering the cost-effectiveness of defined benefit pension plans while contemplating a change to defined contribution plans. This article begins by examining the three primary risks faced by sponsors of most DB pension plans-investment risk, interest rate risk, and longevity risk-and shows how shifting these risks to employees through a DC plan would affect both the corporation and the individual. Although DC plans clearly help companies manage risks, they provide at best an incomplete solution for individual participants. This article describes an innovation in pension design-the Retirement Shares Plan (RSP)-that combines many of the best features of DB and DC plans. An RSP provides: predictable and stable cost to the plan sponsor, with little chance of unfunded liabilities; lifetime income, guaranteeing that retirees will never outlive their benefits; a benefit accrual pattern comparable to that of traditional pension plans that preserves value for older, long-service employees; and potential inflation protection for retirees. The RSP accomplishes this by allocating risk to sponsors and individuals differently than either a traditional DB plan or a DC plan. Unlike most DB plans, the RSP shifts investment and interest rate risks from plan sponsors to participants. Unlike DC plans, the RSP keeps longevity risk with the sponsor.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans
    Sunden, AE
    Surette, BJ
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 88 (02): : 207 - 211
  • [2] Valuation, allocation, and distribution of retirement plans at divorce: Where are we?
    Brandt, EB
    FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY, 2001, 35 (03) : 469 - 495
  • [3] Behavioral biases and retirement assets allocation of corporate pension plans
    Verma, Rahul
    Verma, Priti
    REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2018, 10 (04) : 353 - 369
  • [4] Valuation, optimal asset allocation and retirement incentives of pension plans
    Sundaresan, S
    Zapatero, F
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1997, 10 (03): : 631 - 660
  • [5] RETIREMENT PLANS
    不详
    NATION, 1986, 242 (08) : 225 - 225
  • [6] Plans for Retirement
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1941, 41 (05) : 598 - 598
  • [7] RETIREMENT PLANS
    MARGILOFF, IB
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1984, 80 (02) : 11 - 11
  • [8] NO PLANS FOR RETIREMENT
    COX, CV
    FORTUNE, 1993, 127 (01) : 102 - 102
  • [9] Saving for a Better Retirement: How Risk Attitudes Affect Choice of Retirement Scheme
    Wong, Ricky S.
    Osman, Magda
    Wong, Wai Hung
    Lin, Yiling
    Ho, Kasper
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 122 (01) : 305 - 322
  • [10] ROLE OF RETIREMENT PLANS
    DICKINSON, LJ
    REAL PROPERTY PROBATE AND TRUST JOURNAL, 1975, 10 (04): : 644 - 651