An Assessment of Coastal Zone Hazard Mitigation Plans in Texas

被引:18
|
作者
Kang, Jung Eun [1 ]
Peacock, Walter Gillis [2 ]
Husein, Rahmawati [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Environm Inst, Korea Adaptat Ctr Climate Change, Knowledge & Intelligence Team, 290 Jinheungno, Seoul 122706, South Korea
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, Hazard Reduct & Recovery Ctr, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
hazard mitigation plans; Texas; plan evaluation; and plan quality;
D O I
10.20965/jdr.2010.p0526
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency requires jurisdictions to develop hazard mitigation plans (HMPs) to be eligible for hazard mitigation grants based on the 2000 Disaster Mitigation Act. As of May 2007, over 14,000 local jurisdictions in the US have developed single or multi-jurisdiction local hazard mitigation plans. However, little empirical research has examined the quality of local HMPs. This study develops a comprehensive HMP assessment protocol and then assesses the status of twelve HMPs within the Texas coastal management zone. The components of these plans are systematically examined in order to highlight their strengths and weaknesses. The average plan quality score (PQS) was only 41.6 on a 100-point scale, with a high of 53.3 and a low of 28.7. Regional and county plans displayed higher PSQs than city plans. Most disconcerting was the finding of very low component quality scores for fact basis at 33.6 and mitigation policies & actions at only 28.2. These two components are at the heart of HMPs. The relatively low PQS and CQS results suggest that there are significant improvements that should be undertaken in future iterations of HMPs to better insure long-term disaster resilience of local jurisdictions along the Texas coast.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 534
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do hazard mitigation plans represent the resilience priorities of residents in vulnerable Texas coastal counties?
    Sullivan, Emily
    Goidel, Kirby
    Brown, Stephanie E., V
    Kellstedt, Paul
    Horney, Jennifer A.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 106 (03) : 2337 - 2352
  • [2] Do hazard mitigation plans represent the resilience priorities of residents in vulnerable Texas coastal counties?
    Emily Sullivan
    Kirby Goidel
    Stephanie E. V. Brown
    Paul Kellstedt
    Jennifer A. Horney
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 106 : 2337 - 2352
  • [3] Evaluating the Quality and Implementation of Hazard Mitigation Plans in Coastal Washington State
    Feinberg, Daniel S.
    Ryan, Clare M.
    NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2020, 21 (02)
  • [4] Utilization of geoindicators for rapid assessment of coastal-hazard risk and mitigation
    Bush, DM
    Neal, WJ
    Young, RS
    Pilkey, OH
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 1999, 42 (08) : 647 - 670
  • [5] The Dimensions of Individual Support for Coastal Hazard Mitigation: Analysis of a Survey of Upper Texas Coast Residents
    Ross, Ashley D.
    Atoba, Kayode O.
    NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2022, 23 (02)
  • [6] CONTINENTALITY IN TEXAS COASTAL ZONE
    JEHN, KH
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1977, 105 (07) : 908 - 914
  • [7] CONTINENTALITY IN TEXAS COASTAL ZONE
    JEHN, KH
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 57 (06) : 755 - 755
  • [8] Application of antimicrobial, potential hazard and mitigation plans
    Khoo, Shing Ching
    Goh, Meng Shien
    Alias, Amirah
    Luang-In, Vijitra
    Chin, Kah Wei
    Michelle, Tiong Hui Ling
    Sonne, Christian
    Ma, Nyuk Ling
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 215
  • [9] State Hazard Mitigation Plans and Social Vulnerability
    Painter, Mary Angelica
    Villarreal, Melissa
    Peek, Lori
    JOURNAL OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2023,
  • [10] Green infrastructure in comprehensive plans in coastal Texas
    Woodruff, Sierra
    Tran, Tho
    Lee, Jessica
    Wilkins, Chandler
    Newman, Galen
    Ndubisi, Forster
    Van Zandt, Shannon
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 64 (09) : 1578 - 1598