Marfan Syndrome teaching algorithm: Does it make a difference?

被引:1
|
作者
Strider, David
Keeling, Arlene W.
Tullmann, Dorothy F.
Reigle, Juanita
Cherry, Kenneth J.
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Med Ctr, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Univ Virginia Sch Nursing, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvn.2012.08.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant, connective tissue disorder that is due to a deficiency in the structural protein, fibrillin. MFS patients are more likely to experience aortic aneurysms and dissections, dislocated lens, and/ or severe musculoskeletal deformities than non-MFS patients. Attainment of a longer lifespan in MFS patients is directly dependent on vigilant blood pressure (BP) control, frequent cardiology surveillance, annual eye exams and frequent dental hygiene visits. This study evaluated the effect of a Marfan Syndrome Teaching algorithm (MFSTA) on 20 MFS patients, with regard to BP management, cardiovascular medication adherence; adherence to activity restrictions; and attendance at scheduled eye, cardiology and dental exams. This study demonstrated adherence improvement in the attendance at scheduled cardiology, ophthalmology, and dental exams from 50%, 55% and 70% prior to the study, respectively, to 95%, 90% and 100% post study. Furthermore, subject adherence with self-administration of ordered cardiovascular medications increased from 50% (pre-study) to 93.3% (93.3%), and subject adherence with activity restrictions escalated from 70% (pre-study) to 95% (post study). All subjects demonstrated proficiency in regular testing and recording of their blood pressure. There was no significant change in the mean systolic BP (SBP) for 13 of the subjects who had both pre-and postintervention BP recording, although the post intervention SBP was slightly higher (p = 0.30). However all subjects in the intervention period demonstrated a mean SBP of 124.7 mm Hg, with standard deviation (SD) of 12.9 mm Hg. Limited preintervention BP readings of 7 subjects prevented a pre-and post-SBP comparison. The MFSTA model should be considered for other patient populations involving chronic cardiovascular healthcare conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 31
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTIVE TEACHING DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    RYMHS, R
    ALLSTON, D
    SCHULZ, L
    ALBERTA JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 39 (02): : 191 - 203
  • [2] Ethics Perception: Does Teaching Make a Difference?
    Nguyen, Nhung
    Basuray, M.
    Smith, William
    Kopka, Donald
    McCulloh, Donald
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2008, 84 (02) : 66 - 75
  • [3] Teaching maths outside the classroom: does it make a difference?
    Otte, Camilla R.
    Bolling, Mads
    Elsborg, Peter
    Nielsen, Glen
    Bentsen, Peter
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 61 (01) : 38 - 52
  • [4] DOES TEACHING MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE - PERPLEXED ESSAY
    MCGEE, R
    TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 1974, 1 (02) : 210 - 223
  • [5] Does good clinical teaching really make a difference?
    Irby, DM
    Papadakis, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 110 (03): : 231 - 232
  • [6] DOES THE DIFFERENCE SCHOOLS MAKE, MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    MURPHY, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1985, 36 (01): : 106 - 116
  • [7] TEACHING STUDENTS WITH ASD: DOES TEACHER ENTHUSIASM MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
    Natof, Tammy Hammond
    Romanczyk, Raymond G.
    BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 24 (01) : 55 - 72
  • [8] DOES STUDENT TEACHING MAKE A DIFFERENCE + MUSIC-EDUCATION
    BRAND, M
    MUSIC EDUCATORS JOURNAL, 1985, 71 (08) : 23 - 25
  • [9] TEACHING END-USERS - DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE LATER
    KLASEN, L
    ONLINE, 1990, 14 (04): : 5 - 5
  • [10] DOES ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN STUDENT TEACHING
    MACKEY, JA
    BLACKMON, CR
    ANDREWS, JW
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1977, 59 (04) : 272 - 273