Financial performance of publicly-traded agribusinesses

被引:43
|
作者
Katchova, Ani L. [1 ]
Enlow, Sierra J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Agr Econ, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
Agribusinesses; Compustat; Du Pont analysis; Financial performance; Financial ratios; Farms;
D O I
10.1108/00021461311321311
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose - Agribusinesses represent a fundamental link in connecting farmers with retailers and consumers, yet little research has been done to examine the historical financial performance of these food processing firms. This paper aims to address this issue. Design/methodology/approach - The authors' research examines how publicly-traded agribusinesses perform financially compared to all firms over the period from 1961 to 2011. The authors utilize several indicators of company success, including financial ratios and balance sheet/income statement items, to compare agribusiness firms to all firms in the market. The authors perform the analysis over time and also for companies with low, median, and high performance. They also perform Du Pont analysis to compare return on equity components between agribusinesses and all firms. Findings - The authors find that agribusinesses outperform at the median the sample of all firms in terms of financial ratios related to profitability, liquidity, and market ratios, but have slightly lower liquidity and debt ratios. The Du Pont analysis shows that the higher return on equity for agribusinesses is mostly due to higher asset turnover ratios, indicating higher operating efficiency of agribusinesses. The strong financial performance of food manufacturing agribusinesses makes them valuable companies in an investment portfolio. Originality/value - This study provides a basic overview of financial ratios used to examine the financial performance of publicly-traded agribusinesses. The authors' findings show that agribusinesses outperform all firms in terms of key financial indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Response of Investors in Publicly-Traded Utilities to Blackouts
    Blumsack, Seth
    Ositelu, Oladipu
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 2557 - 2565
  • [2] THE MARKET VALUE OF CONTROL IN PUBLICLY-TRADED CORPORATIONS
    LEASE, RC
    MCCONNELL, JJ
    MIKKELSON, WH
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 11 (1-4) : 439 - 471
  • [3] FAMILY OWNERSHIP AND ACQUISITION BEHAVIOR IN PUBLICLY-TRADED COMPANIES
    Miller, Danny
    Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle
    Lester, Richard H.
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (02) : 201 - 223
  • [4] Quantifying the Impact of Data Loss Incidents on Publicly-traded Organizations
    Hsieh, Tien-Shih
    Noyes, Daniel
    Liu, Hong
    Fiondella, Lance
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGIES FOR HOMELAND SECURITY (HST), 2015,
  • [5] Quarterly Earnings Estimates for Publicly Traded Agribusinesses: An Evaluation.
    Manfredo, Mark
    Sanders, Dwight
    Scott, Winifred
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 33 (03) : 500 - 500
  • [6] Operational and financial performance of publicly traded hospice companies
    McCue, Michael J.
    Thompson, Jon M.
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 8 (06) : 1196 - 1206
  • [7] Efficiency and Productivity of Publicly-Traded Bio-Pharmaceutical Companies in Taiwan
    Lin, Y. H.
    Hong, C. F.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 1328 - 1331
  • [8] Ownership structure of publicly traded newspaper companies and their financial performance
    An, S
    Jin, HS
    Simon, T
    JOURNAL OF MEDIA ECONOMICS, 2006, 19 (02) : 119 - 136
  • [9] Should Financial Gatekeepers be Publicly Traded?
    Huang, Haozhi
    Li, Mingsheng
    Shi, Jing
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 164 (01) : 175 - 200
  • [10] Trends in private patent costs and rents for publicly-traded United States firms
    Bessen, James
    Neuhaeusler, Peter
    Turner, John L.
    Williams, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 56 : 53 - 69