THE EFFECT OF INFORMED CONSENT ON THE LEVEL OF ANXIETY IN PATIENTS GIVEN IV CONTRAST MATERIAL

被引:28
|
作者
HOPPER, KD
HOUTS, PS
TENHAVE, TR
MATTHEWS, YL
COLON, E
HASEMAN, DB
HARTZEL, J
机构
[1] PENN STATE UNIV,DEPT BEHAV SCI,HERSHEY,PA 17033
[2] PENN STATE UNIV,CTR BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL,HERSHEY,PA 17033
[3] WALTER REED ARMY MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,WASHINGTON,DC 20307
[4] DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,HANOVER,NH 03756
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109491
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. A common reason given for not obtaining informed consent before the use of IV contrast material is that the anxiety created by informing patients of potential reactions will increase the possibility of their occurring. However, the idea that this is possible is debatable, and no study of this subject has used a standardized anxiety index. Accordingly, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, we assessed the anxiety level among patients about to have an IV contrast procedure and measured the effect of informing them of the risks associated with the use of contrast material. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Approximately 2050 adult outpatients at three separate medical centers were solicited for participation in this study. Each of the 1251 patients who volunteered to participate was placed into one of six groups. The majority were patients who were awaiting the injection of either ionic or nonionic contrast material and who were or were not informed of the risks associated with the use of IV contrast material. The last two groups were generally healthy outpatients reporting for routine X-rays who were not awaiting IV contrast administration but who were informed of the risks associated with the use of ionic and nonionic contrast material. Each patient informed of the risks was asked to read a standardized consent form, and all patients completed a standardized anxiety index. RESULTS. Patients who were informed of the risks associated with IV contrast material did not have measurably increased anxiety, and they did not have an increased prevalence of adverse reactions. Indeed, the only patients who had statistically significant increased anxiety compared with the other groups were among those awaiting the injection of ionic contrast material who were not informed of the risks (p = .04). The majority (51-78%) of patients in all six groups had measurable elevated anxiety scores. CONCLUSION. We conclude that it is not justified to fail to obtain informed consent in order to avoid anxiety-induced adverse reactions to IV contrast material. The majority of patients awaiting injection of IV contrast material have measurable increased anxiety levels regardless of whether they are informed of its risks.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 535
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of informed consent for intravascular contrast material on the level of anxiety: How much information should be given?
    Yucel, A
    Gecici, O
    Emul, M
    Oyar, O
    Gulsoy, UK
    Dayanir, YO
    Acar, M
    Degirmenci, B
    Haktanir, A
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (07) : 701 - 707
  • [2] The effects of the informed consent given for cesarean section on anxiety and knowledge
    Yildirim, G.
    Cetin, A.
    Aksu, M.
    Altiparmak, S.
    Guler, N.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 41 (01): : 62 - 66
  • [3] HOW INFORMED ARE PATIENTS WHO HAVE GIVEN INFORMED CONSENT
    HARRISON, RF
    BRENNAN, M
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6444): : 558 - 558
  • [5] Effect of informed consent on anxiety in patients undergoing diagnostic electrophysiology studies
    Goldberger, JJ
    Kruse, J
    Parker, MA
    Kadish, AH
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 134 (01) : 119 - 126
  • [6] EFFECT OF INFORMED CONSENT ON PATIENT ANXIETY LEVELS
    GOLDBERGER, J
    KRUSE, J
    DOYLE, S
    BARRETT, A
    BURKE, J
    SMITH, J
    KIM, YH
    KADISH, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, : A167 - A167
  • [7] INFORMED CONSENT - EFFECT ON PATIENTS
    GOLDBERGER, J
    KRUSE, J
    BARRETT, A
    DOYLE, S
    EHLERT, F
    KADISH, A
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 40 (02): : A158 - A158
  • [8] WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT FOR IV-CONTRAST-ENHANCED RADIOGRAPHY - PATIENTS ATTITUDES AND COMMON LIMITATIONS
    SPRING, DB
    WINFIELD, AC
    FRIEDLAND, GW
    SHUMAN, WP
    PREGER, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 151 (06) : 1243 - 1245
  • [9] WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT FOR IV CONTRAST-ENHANCED RADIOGRAPHY - REPLY
    SPRING, DB
    WINFIELD, AC
    FRIEDLAND, GW
    SHUMAN, WP
    PREGER, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (01) : 189 - 189
  • [10] INFORMED CONSENT FOR INTRAVASCULAR ADMINISTRATION OF CONTRAST MATERIAL - HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH
    HOPPER, KD
    TYLER, HN
    RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (02) : 509 - 514