共 50 条
Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Method-Comparison Studies
被引:227
|作者:
Hanneman, Sandra K.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Nursing, Nursing Res, 6901 Bertner Ave,Room 592, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Nursing, Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Nursing, Ctr Nursing Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
bias;
clinical measurement;
method-comparison;
precision;
temperature;
D O I:
10.1097/01.AACN.0000318125.41512.a3
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
Clinicians often need to know whether a new method of measurement is equivalent to an established one already in clinical use. This article reviews the methodology of a method-comparison study to assist the clinician with the conduct and evaluation of such studies. Temperature data from 1 subject are used to illustrate the procedures. Although one would not make decisions on the basis of the findings from 1 subject, the large number of paired measurements in the data set permits its use for illustrative purposes. Currently available software eliminates the need for tedious statistical computation but does not reduce the burden of understanding the concepts underlying a method-comparison study and accurate interpretation of the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文