Comparative Study of Path Loss Models of WiMAX at 2.5 GHz Frequency Band

被引:0
|
作者
Alam, Md. Didarul [1 ]
Khan, Md. Rezaul Huque [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chittagong, Dept Appl Phys Elect & Commun Engn, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh
关键词
WiMAX; Path loss; Stanford University Interim (SUI) model; ECC-33; model; Ericsson model; Hata model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
Correct prediction of path loss is a pivotal step of WiMAX network planning to estimate external interference level and cell radius accurately. In this paper, different path loss models are compared depending on various parameters like frequency, height of receiver antenna, distance between transmitter and receiver etc. For comparative analysis, COST 231 Hata model, COST 231 Walfisch-Ikegami model, Stanford University Interim (SUI) model, Ericsson model, ECC-33 model and Free Space Path Loss models are used in three different environments (Urban, Suburban and Rural environments). After analyzing the results, it is found that no single model is suited or recommended for all types of propagation environments at 2.5 GHz frequency band.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Study on Indoor Path Loss Models at 28 GHz, 60 GHz, and 73.5 GHz Frequency Bands
    Obeidat, Huthaifa A.
    Alabdullah, Ali
    Mosleh, Mahmood F.
    Ullah, Atta
    Obeidat, Omar A.
    Abd-Alhameed, Raed A.
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2020, 35 (02): : 119 - 128
  • [2] Propagation Path Loss and Materials Insertion Loss in Indoor Environment at WiMAX Band of 3.3 to 3.6 GHz
    Taha Ahmed, Bazil
    Masa Campos, Jose Luis
    Lalueza Mayordomo, Jose Maria
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 66 (02) : 251 - 260
  • [3] Propagation Path Loss and Materials Insertion Loss in Indoor Environment at WiMAX Band of 3.3 to 3.6 GHz
    Bazil Taha Ahmed
    José Luis Masa Campos
    Jose Maria Lalueza Mayordomo
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2012, 66 : 251 - 260
  • [4] Indoor Path Loss Variations with Frequency and Visibility Conditions at 3.5 GHz Band
    Cuinas, Migo
    Garcia Sanchez, Manuel
    Feys, Arne
    Debaenst, Wout
    Verhaevert, Jo
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION AND USNC-URSI RADIO SCIENCE MEETING, 2019, : 2067 - 2068
  • [5] A Comparative Analysis of Mobile WiMAX 2.5 GHz and 3.65 GHz for Freight Railroad Applications
    Shrestha, Pradhumna Lal
    Hempel, Michael
    Sharif, Hamid
    Mehrvarzi, Shahram
    2013 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IIT), 2013,
  • [6] Comprehensive performance analysis of path loss models on GSM 940 MHz and IEEE 802.16 Wimax frequency 3.5 GHz on different terrains
    Rakesh, N.
    Nalineswari, D.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI), 2015,
  • [7] Impact of Ultra Wide Band emission on WiMAX systems at 2.5 and 3.5 GHz
    Taha Ahmed, Bazil
    Masa Campos, Jose Luis
    Ruiz-Cruz, Jorge A.
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2010, 54 (10) : 1573 - 1583
  • [8] Experimental Path Loss Models for In-Body Communications Within 2.36-2.5 GHz
    Chavez-Santiago, Raul
    Garcia-Pardo, Concepcion
    Fornes-Leal, Alejandro
    Valles-Lluch, Ana
    Vermeeren, Guenter
    Joseph, Wout
    Balasingham, Ilangko
    Cardona, Narcis
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2015, 19 (03) : 930 - 937
  • [9] A Novel Triple Band Pass Frequency Selective Surface for the Proliferation the Performance of WiMax and WLAN 2.5/3.5/5.5 GHz
    Garg, Monika
    Chahar, Rekha
    Yadav, Sanjeev
    OPTICAL AND WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, OWT 2017, 2018, 472 : 421 - 428
  • [10] Seasonal variations in path loss in the 3.7 GHz band
    Batariere, MD
    Blankenship, TK
    Kepler, JF
    Krauss, TP
    RAWCON: 2004 IEEE RADIO AND WIRELESS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 399 - 402