Towards an assessment of public library value Statistics on the policy makers' agenda

被引:11
作者
Paberza, Kristine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Latvia, Dept Informat & Lib Studies, Riga, Latvia
关键词
Latvia; Public libraries; Trust; Information research;
D O I
10.1108/14678041011026892
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to present a methodology, early findings, possible applications of results and lessons learned from the research study "Public libraries: value, trust and satisfaction", which has been conducted within the public library development project 'Father's Third Son' in Latvia. Design/methodology/approach - A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used (although the findings reported here are largely drawn from the quantitative study) drawing on various theories of information behaviour and use-oriented information service evaluation. Findings - The study gives a good picture of user information needs in Latvia, the sources they use to fulfil them and the role of public libraries within this picture, especially in relation to cultural and recreational interests and public support for public libraries in terms of potential funding. The public library influence on people's leisure hours and their support for education are highlighted. The advocacy implications of this work are reviewed. Research limitations/implications - Although this report is confined to the early stages of the study, the work was conducted on a substantial scale. Originality/value - The work reported here provides new evidence of library use and appreciation in Latvia. The later results of this study, combined with evidence gathered by other participants in the Global Libraries initiative, will provide a commanding view of the significance of public libraries across a range of countries.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Berryman J., 2005, SUSTAINING COMMUNITI
[2]  
Davenport T., 1997, INFORM ECOLOGY MASTE
[3]  
Durrance JC, 2002, REF USER SERV Q, V42, P43
[4]  
Fenner Audrey, 2002, LIB PHILOS PRACTICE, V4
[5]  
NARDI BA, 1999, INFORM ECOLOGIES USI
[6]  
Saracevic T, 1997, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V48, P527, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199706)48:6<527::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-W
[8]  
Savolainen R, 2005, THEORIES INFORM BEHA
[9]  
Wavell Caroline, 2002, IMPACT EVALUATION MU
[10]  
Williamson K., 2005, THEORIES INFORM BEHA