ANTIMURINE ANTIBODY-FORMATION FOLLOWING OKT3 THERAPY

被引:59
|
作者
SCHROEDER, TJ
FIRST, MR
MANSOUR, ME
HURTUBISE, PE
HARIHARAN, S
RYCKMAN, FC
MUNDA, R
MELVIN, DB
PENN, I
BALLISTRERI, WF
ALEXANDER, JW
机构
[1] UNIV CINCINNATI,DEPT INTERNAL MED,CINCINNATI,OH 45267
[2] UNIV CINCINNATI,DEPT SURG,CINCINNATI,OH 45267
[3] UNIV CINCINNATI,DEPT PEDIAT,CINCINNATI,OH 45267
[4] CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR,CINCINNATI,OH 45229
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-199001000-00010
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
OKT3 is an IgG2a murine monoclonal antibody directed against the CD3 antigen receptor of human T lymphocytes. A major concern with OKT3 treatment in solid organ transplant recipients is the development of antimouse antibody, which may preclude retreatment with this agent. We have administered OKT3 on 215 occasions (150 re n a l,34 hepatic, 26 cardiac, 5 pancreatic) in 179 patients between April 1982 and December 1988. The mean duration of treatment was 10.5 days (range, 2-22 days). Antimouse antibody data were analyzed on the most recent 133 treatment courses where the antibody status was available pretreatment. Determination of antimouse antibody production was elicited by ELISA technology at days 0, 7,14, and 28 of OKT3 treatment. Patients were categorized according to the antibody response as follows: (a) absence of antibody;(b)low titer (1:100); or (c) high titer (>1:1000). Our earlier experience has demonstrated that retreatment with OKT3 is successful in groups a and b. The development of antimurine antibodies was analyzed with regard to the following parameters:(1)The duration of OKT3 treatment; (2) treatment type (prophylactic, primary, or secondary); (3) primary treatment or retreatment; (4) concomitant immunosuppressive regimen (double or triple therapy); (5) dosage of concomitant immunosuppressive drugs; and (6) transplant organ type. The following results were obtained.(1)Duration of treatment had no effect on antibody production (11.0 days in antibody negative and 10.0 days in antibody positive). (2) There was no difference in antibody formation rates for the first treatment of OKT3 when it was used as prophylaxis (26%), primary (19%), or secondary (27%) therapy. (3) Antibody formation rate with first treatment was 29%; with retreatment, patients who were antibody negative following first treatment became positive in 28% of cases, and retreated patients who were low titer positive following first treatment converted to high titer in 57% of cases. (4) Antibody formation was higher in patients receiving double immunosuppressive therapy (36%) than in those receiving triple immunosuppressive therapy (21%) during OKT3 treatment. (5) Concomitant immunosuppression was lower in the antibody-positive group during OKT3 therapy: steroids, 61 mg/day vs. 52 mg/day; azathioprine, 89 mg/day vs. 66 mg/day; CsA, 317 mg/day v s .186 mg/ day. (6) Antibody formation rates were lower in nonrenal transplants following first treatment with OKT3 (liver 17%, heart 17%, kidney 28%); this reflects the higher doses of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy used in nonrenal transplants. In conclusion, antimouse antibody formation varies inversely with th amount of immunosuppression used during OKT3 therapy, and the ability to reuse OKT3 can be related to maintenance of baseline immunosuppressive therapy. © 1990 by Williams and Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 51
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OKT3 ANTIBODY-FORMATION AFTER OKT3 INDUCTION THERAPY
    MCBRIDE, DT
    HENNESSY, PK
    TESI, RJ
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 37 : 113 - 113
  • [2] ANTIMURINE ANTIBODY TO OKT3 IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR PROPHYLAXIS AND RETREATMENT OF REJECTION
    OCONNELL, JB
    BRISTOW, MR
    HAMMOND, EH
    MENLOVE, RL
    ENSLEY, RD
    RATKOVEC, RM
    RENLUND, DG
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1991, 23 (01) : 1157 - 1159
  • [3] DIFFERENCES IN ANTIBODY-FORMATION TO OKT3 BETWEEN KIDNEY AND HEART-TRANSPLANTATION RECIPIENTS
    HESSE, CJ
    HEYSE, P
    STOLK, BJM
    HENDRIKS, GFJ
    WEIMAR, W
    BALK, AHMM
    MOCHTAR, B
    JUTTE, NHPM
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1989, 21 (01) : 979 - 980
  • [4] THE INCIDENCE OF ANTIBODY-FORMATION TO OKT3 CONSEQUENT TO ITS USE IN ORGAN-TRANSPLANTATION
    CAREY, G
    LISI, PJ
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (02) : 151 - 158
  • [5] THE INCIDENCE AND QUANTITY OF ANTIIDIOTYPIC ANTIBODY-FORMATION AFTER OKT3 MONOCLONAL THERAPY IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    HESSE, CJ
    HEYSE, P
    STOLK, BJM
    BALK, AHMM
    JUTTE, NHPM
    MOCHTAR, B
    WEIMAR, W
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1990, 22 (04) : 1772 - 1773
  • [6] NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING OKT3 THERAPY
    ROGER, SD
    ALLEN, RD
    HARRIS, DC
    LAWRENCE, S
    STEWART, JH
    CHAPMAN, JR
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 36 (06) : 1179 - 1179
  • [7] OKT3 monoclonal antibody therapy and visual loss
    Horina, JH
    Horn, S
    Holzer, H
    Langmann, G
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 11 (07) : 1497 - 1497
  • [8] FAILURE OF ORTHOCLONE OKT3 RETREATMENT IN A PANCREAS TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT WITH ANTIMURINE ANTIBODIES
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    MUNDA, R
    PEDERSEN, SH
    HURTUBISE, PE
    ALEXANDER, JW
    FIRST, MR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 1990, 4 (02) : 99 - 101
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF INDOMETHACIN ON THE FEBRILE RESPONSE FOLLOWING OKT3 THERAPY
    FIRST, MR
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    HARIHARAN, S
    ALEXANDER, JW
    WEISKITTEL, P
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 53 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [10] IMMUNOLOGICAL MONITORING DURING AND FOLLOWING OKT3 THERAPY IN CHILDREN
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    RYCKMAN, FC
    HURTUBISE, PE
    PEDERSEN, SH
    BALISTRERI, WF
    FIRST, MR
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 5 (02) : 191 - 196