Imaging in primary penile cancer: current status and future directions

被引:0
|
作者
Rohit Kochhar
Ben Taylor
Vijay Sangar
机构
[1] The Christie,Department of Radiology
[2] NHS Foundation Trust,Department of Urology
[3] The Christie,undefined
[4] NHS Foundation Trust,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2010年 / 20卷
关键词
Penile cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography; Ultrasound; Sentinel lymph node;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Penile cancer is a rare neoplasm in the developed world. Clinical assessment often results in inaccurate staging and radiological techniques have a key role in staging and postoperative assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicts penile anatomy in detail and is the most accurate technique for local staging and postoperative follow-up. MRI and ultrasound (US), although helpful for assessment of lymph nodes, are not reliable enough for accurate nodal staging. US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), however, remains a valuable tool to confirm metastases in suspicious inguinal nodes. Lymphoscintigraphy with dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) is a promising technique used to predict occult lymph node metastases. Novel imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) and nanoparticle enhanced MRI have high sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases but their availability is limited and clinical utility is not fully established. The radiologist needs to be familiar with the normal penile anatomy, imaging appearances of pre- and post-treatment penile cancer, and the advantages and limitations of the available imaging techniques. This review highlights the above points and presents a systematic approach to make the best use of imaging in the management of patients with penile cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 47
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imaging in primary penile cancer: current status and future directions
    Kochhar, Rohit
    Taylor, Ben
    Sangar, Vijay
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [2] Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions
    Sonpavde, G.
    Pagliaro, L. C.
    Buonerba, C.
    Dorff, T. B.
    Lee, R. J.
    Di Lorenzo, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (05) : 1179 - 1189
  • [3] Current Management Strategy for Penile Cancer and Future Directions
    Tanya B. Dorff
    Leslie K. Ballas
    Anne K. Schuckman
    Current Oncology Reports, 2017, 19
  • [4] Current Management Strategy for Penile Cancer and Future Directions
    Dorff, Tanya B.
    Ballas, Leslie K.
    Schuckman, Anne K.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 19 (08)
  • [5] Imaging Breast Cancer Bone Metastases: Current Status and Future Directions
    Glendenning, Jennifer
    Cook, Gary
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 43 (04) : 317 - 323
  • [6] Current Status and Future Directions in Colorectal Cancer
    Meyer, B.
    Are, Chandrakanth
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (04) : 440 - 441
  • [7] Cancer Immunotherapy Current Status and Future Directions
    Ito, Fumito
    Chang, Alfred E.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 22 (04) : 765 - +
  • [8] Current Status and Future Directions in Colorectal Cancer
    Bria Meyer
    Chandrakanth Are
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 8 (4) : 455 - 456
  • [9] Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Urothelial Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions
    Mcdonald, Sam
    Keane, Kevin G.
    Gauci, Richard
    Hayne, Dickon
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [10] Cancer Immunoprevention: Current Status and Future Directions
    Keshavarz-Fathi, Mahsa
    Rezaei, Nima
    ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2021, 69 (01)