Comparison of various surgical methods in the treatment of implant-related infection

被引:0
|
作者
Muhittin Şener
Cemal Kazimoglu
Hasan Karapınar
İzge Günal
İlhan Afşar
Aslı Gamze Karataş Şener
机构
[1] Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[2] Dokuz Eylül Üniversity,Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
[3] Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital,Department of Microbiology
来源
关键词
Bone Graft; Teicoplanin; Colony Count; Autogenous Bone; Autogenous Bone Graft;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The treatment of implant-related infections is troublesome. This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of three different surgical modalities in the treatment of implant-related infection. A total of 32 Wistar albino rats were randomised into four groups after the establishment of implant-related infection: no treatment, surgical débridement, antibiotic-loaded bone cement and antibiotic-loaded autogenous bone. Microbiological colony counts were made at the sixth week in order to evaluate the effectiveness of of the treatments. The antibiotic-loaded bone cement group revealed superior results compared with the other groups in terms of reduction of microbiological colonies. Three animals in the bone cement group revealed extensive infection. Although antibiotic-loaded bone cement showed superiority over other treatment modalities, it should be employed after an unsuccessful trial of débridement because of the risk of extensive infection.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 423
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of various surgical methods in the treatment of implant-related infection
    Sener, Muhittin
    Kazimoglu, Cemal
    Karapinar, Hasan
    Gunal, Izge
    Afsar, Ilhan
    Sener, Asli Gamze Karatas
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (03) : 419 - 423
  • [2] Reply to the comments on our article "Comparison of various surgical methods in the treatment of implant-related infection"
    Sener, Muhittin
    Kazimoglu, Cemal
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (03) : 455 - 455
  • [3] Reply to the comments on our article “Comparison of various surgical methods in the treatment of implant-related infection”
    Muhittin Şener
    Cemal Kazimoglu
    International Orthopaedics, 2010, 34 : 455 - 455
  • [4] Risk factors for early implant-related surgical site infection
    Kok, Ta Wei Kevin
    Agrawal, Nikunj
    Sathappan, S. S.
    Chen, Weijing Kelven
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 24 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [5] The effect of proteolytic enzyme serratiopeptidase in the treatment of experimental implant-related infection
    Mecikoglu, Mete
    Saygi, Baransel
    Yildirim, Yakup
    Karadag-Saygi, Evrim
    Ramadan, Saime Sezgin
    Esemenli, Tanil
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (06): : 1208 - 1214
  • [6] Surface treatment strategies to combat implant-related infection from the beginning
    Wang, Minqi
    Tang, Tingting
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2019, 17 : 42 - 54
  • [7] Implant-related infection model in rat spine
    Ender Ali Ofluoglu
    Mehmet Zileli
    Derya Aydin
    Yakup Sancar Baris
    Omer Kuçukbasmaci
    Nevriye Gonullu
    Onder Ofluoglu
    Halil Toplamaoglu
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2007, 127 : 391 - 396
  • [8] Implant-related infection model in rat spine
    Ofluoglu, Ender Ali
    Zileli, Mehmet
    Aydin, Derya
    Baris, Yakup Sancar
    Kucukbasmaci, Omer
    Gonullu, Nevriye
    Ofluoglu, Onder
    Toplamaoglu, Halil
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2007, 127 (05) : 391 - 396
  • [9] Flap Designs for Implant-Related Surgical Procedures: A Review
    AL-Juboori, Mohammed Jasim
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (06) : 845 - 854
  • [10] Linezolid in the treatment of implant-related chronic osteomyelitis
    Vercillo, Michael
    Patzakis, Michael J.
    Holtom, Paul
    Zalavras, Charalampos G.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (461) : 40 - 43