Estimation of ground cavity configurations using ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry

被引:0
|
作者
Won-Taek Hong
Jong-Sub Lee
机构
[1] Korea University,School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering
来源
Natural Hazards | 2018年 / 92卷
关键词
Ground cavity; Ground penetrating radar; Relative permittivity; Sinkhole; Time domain reflectometry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ground cavity configurations, including depth, roof shape, and length, are the main factors affecting the risk of ground sinkholes. In this study, ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry are applied to estimate the ground cavity configurations. To accurately estimate ground relative permittivity with depth, a penetrometer incorporated with a time domain reflectometry (PTDR) system is developed. In addition, a new method is established to calculate the coordinates of the reflection points. Experimental studies are conducted on ground models prepared in different soil types with buried objects of various shapes to simulate ground cavities by using circular rubber tubes and rectangular and trapezoidal polystyrene objects. The experimental studies show that the estimated depths of the buried objects are identical to the experimental setup. The estimated roof shapes clearly represent the roof shapes of the buried objects. In addition, the estimated diameters of the rubber tubes and the estimated lengths of the polystyrene objects show good agreement with those of the buried objects. This study shows that the ground penetrating radar survey, PTDR test, and the new method for estimating ground cavity configurations may be effectively used to assess the risk of ground sinkholes.
引用
收藏
页码:1789 / 1807
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation of ground cavity configurations using ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry
    Hong, Won-Taek
    Lee, Jong-Sub
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 92 (03) : 1789 - 1807
  • [2] Evalution of Railway Track Substructure using Ground Penetrating Radar Coupled with Time Domain Reflectometry
    Alsabhan, Abdullah
    Fratta, Dante
    Tinjum, James
    FROM FUNDAMENTALS TO APPLICATIONS IN GEOTECHNICS, 2015, : 298 - 305
  • [3] Comparison of ground penetrating radar and time-domain reflectometry as soil water sensors
    Weiler, KW
    Steenhuis, TS
    Boll, J
    Kung, KJS
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1998, 62 (05) : 1237 - 1239
  • [4] Comparison of ground penetrating radar and time-domain reflectometry as soil water sensors
    Weiler, Kirk W.
    Steenhuis, Tammo S.
    Boll, Jan
    Kung, K.-J. Samuel
    Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62 (05): : 1237 - 1239
  • [5] Identifying causes of ground-penetrating radar reflections using time-domain reflectometry and sedimentological analyses
    Van Dam, RL
    Schlager, W
    SEDIMENTOLOGY, 2000, 47 (02) : 435 - 449
  • [6] Enhancement of leak detection in pipelines through time-domain reflectometry/ground penetrating radar measurements
    Cataldo, Andrea
    De Benedetto, Egidio
    Cannazza, Giuseppe
    Leucci, Giovanni
    De Giorgi, Lara
    Demitri, Christian
    IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 11 (06) : 696 - 702
  • [7] An Integrated Hydrogeophysical Approach for Unsaturated Zone Monitoring Using Time Domain Reflectometry, Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Ground Penetrating Radar
    Papadopoulos, Alexandros
    Apostolopoulos, George
    Kallioras, Andreas
    WATER, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [8] Soil water content measurements at different scales: accuracy of time domain reflectometry and ground-penetrating radar
    Huisman, JA
    Sperl, C
    Bouten, W
    Verstraten, JM
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 245 (1-4) : 48 - 58
  • [9] Engineered Surface Barrier Monitoring Using Ground-Penetrating Radar, Time-Domain Reflectometry, and Neutron-Scattering Techniques
    Strickland, Christopher E.
    Ward, Andy L.
    Clement, William P.
    Draper, Kathryn E.
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2010, 9 (02) : 415 - 423
  • [10] Stochastic estimation of facies using ground penetrating radar data
    Moysey, S
    Caers, J
    Knight, R
    Allen-King, RM
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2003, 17 (05) : 306 - 318