How do instructional designers manage learners’ cognitive load? An examination of awareness and application of strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Justin Sentz
Jill Stefaniak
John Baaki
Angela Eckhoff
机构
[1] Old Dominion University,
[2] College of Education,undefined
[3] University of Georgia,undefined
关键词
Cognitive load; Instructional designers; Designer awareness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined how practicing instructional designers manage cognitive load in a standardized scenario as they select and implement instructional strategies, message design, content sequencing, delivery medium, and technology within various domains with learners at different levels of expertise. The study employed a quasi-experimental, mixed methods design to gain insight into how practicing instructional designers perceive their awareness of strategies to manage cognitive load and implement those strategies within a standardized design scenario. The results of the study indicated that both novice and expert practitioners frequently used several strategies to manage extraneous load (worked examples, completion tasks, and dual modality) as prescribed by theory, as well as the simple-to-complex presentation strategy to manage intrinsic load. While participants frequently acknowledged differences in the levels of learner expertise within the instructional scenario, few employed strategies prescribed to address the expertise reversal effect as outlined by theory. Based on the results of this study, we present a framework to assist designers with managing for cognitive load in their everyday design practices.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 245
页数:46
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do instructional designers manage learners' cognitive load? An examination of awareness and application of strategies
    Sentz, Justin
    Stefaniak, Jill
    Baaki, John
    Eckhoff, Angela
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 67 (01): : 199 - 245
  • [2] Instructional Strategies to Manage Cognitive Load in Orthodontics
    Asad, Saad
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2016, 22 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [3] Instructional Heuristics for the Use of Worked Examples to Manage Instructional Designers’ Cognitive Load while Problem-Solving
    Justin Sentz
    Jill Stefaniak
    TechTrends, 2019, 63 : 209 - 225
  • [4] Instructional Heuristics for the Use of Worked Examples to Manage Instructional Designers' Cognitive Load while Problem-Solving
    Sentz, Justin
    Stefaniak, Jill
    TECHTRENDS, 2019, 63 (02) : 209 - 225
  • [5] How do instructional designers use automated instructional design tool?
    Uduma, Letitia
    Morrison, Gary R.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (01) : 536 - 553
  • [6] How do instructional designers evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice
    Williams, David D.
    South, Joseph B.
    Yanchar, Stephen C.
    Wilson, Brent G.
    Allen, Stephanie
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 59 (06): : 885 - 907
  • [7] How do instructional designers evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice
    David D. Williams
    Joseph B. South
    Stephen C. Yanchar
    Brent G. Wilson
    Stephanie Allen
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2011, 59 : 885 - 907
  • [8] How do we teach pediatric topics in transfusion medicine: curriculum development, learners, and instructional strategies
    Ambruso, Daniel R.
    Sanchez, Rosa
    Sloan, Steven R.
    Josephson, Cassandra D.
    TRANSFUSION, 2013, 53 (02) : 250 - 256
  • [9] Cognitive load and online course quality: Insights from instructional designers in a higher education context
    Caskurlu, Secil
    Richardson, Jennifer C.
    Alamri, Hamdan A.
    Chartier, Katherine
    Farmer, Tadd
    Janakiraman, Shamila
    Strait, Marquetta
    Yang, Mohan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 52 (02) : 584 - 605
  • [10] The effect of design tasks on the cognitive load level of instructional designers in 3D MUVEs
    Cinar, Murat
    Dogan, Dilek
    Tuzun, Hakan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (02) : 1103 - 1120