Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: technical issues and outcome

被引:0
|
作者
Evangelos Liatsikos
Panagiotis Kallidonis
Minh Do
Anja Dietel
Abdulrahman Al-Aown
Constantinos Constantinidis
Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
机构
[1] University of Patras,Department of Urology
[2] University of Leipzig,Department of Urology, International Training Centre of Urologic Laparoscopy
[3] University of Athens Medical School,Department of Urology
[4] ‘Laikon’ General Hospital,undefined
来源
World Journal of Urology | 2013年 / 31卷
关键词
Laparoscopic; Radical nephrectomy; Partial nephrectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The laparoscopic approach has been established as a treatment modality for the performance of radical nephrectomy during the recent years, while laparoscopic partial nephrectomy represents an alternative under investigation in several centers of laparoscopic excellence around the world. Significant advantages of laparoscopic surgery when compared to the classical open approach have extensively documented for over 2 decades. Nevertheless, laparoscopy is an evolving surgical field, which is characterized by the rapid adaptation of technical innovations. Laparoscopic renal surgery includes approaches for radical and partial nephrectomy with oncological outcome similar to open surgery and decreased postoperative morbidity and therefore can be considered for the same indications as open surgery. Several issues regarding the technical feasibility and refinement as well as the oncological efficacy of these procedures are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 791
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: technical issues and outcome
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Minh Do
    Dietel, Anja
    Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
    Constantinidis, Constantinos
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) : 785 - 791
  • [2] Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy
    Tierney, AC
    Nakada, SY
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 18 (04) : 249 - 256
  • [3] Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy
    A. C. Tierney
    S. Y. Nakada
    World Journal of Urology, 2000, 18 : 249 - 256
  • [4] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus open radical nephrectomy: A outcome analysis
    Vyas, Jigish
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Sharma, Rajan
    Muthu, V.
    Manohar, T.
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A188 - A188
  • [5] Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Technical considerations and an update
    Dominguez-Escrig, Jose L.
    Vasdev, Nikhil
    O'Riordon, Anna
    Soomro, Naeem
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2011, 7 (04) : 205 - 221
  • [6] Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: key technical points
    Kinoshita, Hidefumi
    Kawa, Gen
    Matsuda, Tadashi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A4 - A4
  • [7] Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: an Update on Contemporary Issues
    Andonian, Sero
    Janetschek, Guenter
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 35 (03) : 385 - 396
  • [8] Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy: Techniques and outcome
    Deger, Serdar
    Wille, Andreas
    Roigas, Jan
    Lein, Michael
    Giessing, Markus
    Johannsen, Manfred
    Ebeling, Volko
    Loening, Stefan A.
    Bachmann, Alexander
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (10) : 630 - 634
  • [9] Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Indications and outcome
    Zacharias, M.
    Eichelberg, C.
    Heuer, R.
    Ahyai, S.
    Chun, F.
    Heinzer, H.
    ONKOLOGE, 2008, 14 (10): : 992 - +
  • [10] Changes in Renal Function After Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison With Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy
    Kang, Su Hwan
    Rhew, Hyun Yul
    Kim, Taek Sang
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (01) : 22 - 25