Snowfall and snowpack in the Western U.S. as captured by convection permitting climate simulations: current climate and pseudo global warming future climate

被引:0
|
作者
Kyoko Ikeda
Roy Rasmussen
Changhai Liu
Andrew Newman
Fei Chen
Mike Barlage
Ethan Gutmann
Jimy Dudhia
Aiguo Dai
Charles Luce
Keith Musselman
机构
[1] NCAR National Center for Atmospheric Research,
[2] NOAA Environmental Modeling Center,undefined
[3] State University of New York At Albany,undefined
[4] U.S. Forest Service,undefined
[5] University of Colorado,undefined
来源
Climate Dynamics | 2021年 / 57卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines current and future western U.S. snowfall and snowpack through current and future climate simulations with a 4-km horizontal grid spacing cloud permitting regional climate model over the entire CONtinental U.S. for a 13-year period between 2001 and 2013. At this horizontal resolution, the spatiotemporal distribution of the orographic snowfall and snowpack is well captured partly due to the ability of the model to realistically simulate mesoscale and microphysical features such as orographically induced updrafts driving clouds and precipitation. The historical simulation well captures the observed snowfall and snowpack amounts and pattern in the western U.S. The future climate simulation uses the Pseudo-Global Warming approach, taking the climate change signal from CMIP5 multi-model ensemble-mean difference between 2070–2099 and 1976–2005. The results show that the thermodynamic impacts of climate change in the western U.S. can be characterized considering mountain ranges in two distinct geographic regions: the mountain ranges close to the Pacific Ocean (coastal ranges) and those in the inter-mountain west. Climate change out to 2100 significantly impacts all aspects of the water cycle, with pronounced climate change response in the coastal ranges. A notable result is that the snowpack in the Pacific Northwest is predicted to decrease by ~ 70% by 2100. Trends of this magnitude have already been observed in the historical data and in previous studies. The current Pseudo Global Warming future climate simulation and previous global climate simulations all suggest that these trends will continue to the point that most snowpack will be gone by 2100 in the Pacific Northwest for the most aggressive RCP8.5 climate scenario, even if annual precipitation increases by 10%. Future work will focus on extending the current convective permitting results to a full climate change simulation allowing for dynamical changes in the flow.
引用
收藏
页码:2191 / 2215
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Snowfall and snowpack in the Western US as captured by convection permitting climate simulations: current climate and pseudo global warming future climate
    Ikeda, Kyoko
    Rasmussen, Roy
    Liu, Changhai
    Newman, Andrew
    Chen, Fei
    Barlage, Mike
    Gutmann, Ethan
    Dudhia, Jimy
    Dai, Aiguo
    Luce, Charles
    Musselman, Keith
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2021, 57 (7-8) : 2191 - 2215
  • [2] The Effect of Pseudo-Global Warming on the Weather-Climate System of Africa in a Convection-Permitting Model
    Ocasio, K. M. Nunez
    Dougherty, Erin M.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (24)
  • [3] Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change
    Liang, Xin-Zhong
    Pan, Jianping
    Zhu, Jinhong
    Kunkel, Kenneth E.
    Wang, Julian X. L.
    Dai, Aiguo
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D10)
  • [4] Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Change Simulations for Understanding Future Climate and Informing Decision-Making in Africa
    Senior, Catherine A.
    Marsham, John H.
    Berthou, Segolene
    Burgin, Laura E.
    Folwell, Sonja S.
    Kendon, Elizabeth J.
    Klein, Cornelia M.
    Jones, Richard G.
    Mittal, Neha
    Rowell, David P.
    Tomassini, Lorenzo
    Vischel, Theo
    Becker, Bernd
    Birch, Cathryn E.
    Crook, Julia
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    Finney, Declan L.
    Graham, Richard J.
    Hart, Neil C. G.
    Jack, Christopher D.
    Jackson, Lawrence S.
    James, Rachel
    Koelle, Bettina
    Misiani, Herbert
    Mwalukanga, Brenda
    Parker, Douglas J.
    Stratton, Rachel A.
    Taylor, Christopher M.
    Tucker, Simon O.
    Wainwright, Caroline M.
    Washington, Richard
    Willet, Martin R.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 102 (06) : E1206 - E1223
  • [5] How a typical West African day in the future-climate compares with current-climate conditions in a convection-permitting and parameterised convection climate model
    Rory G. J. Fitzpatrick
    Douglas J. Parker
    John H. Marsham
    David P. Rowell
    Lawrence S. Jackson
    Declan Finney
    Chetan Deva
    Simon Tucker
    Rachael Stratton
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 267 - 296
  • [6] How a typical West African day in the future-climate compares with current-climate conditions in a convection-permitting and parameterised convection climate model
    Fitzpatrick, Rory G. J.
    Parker, Douglas J.
    Marsham, John H.
    Rowell, David P.
    Jackson, Lawrence S.
    Finney, Declan
    Deva, Chetan
    Tucker, Simon
    Stratton, Rachael
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (01) : 267 - 296
  • [7] Multidecadal convection permitting climate simulations over Belgium: sensitivity of future precipitation extremes
    Saeed, Sajjad
    Brisson, Erwan
    Demuzere, Matthias
    Tabari, Hossein
    Willems, Patrick
    van Lipzig, Nicole P. M.
    ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 18 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [8] Assessing U.S. public perceptions of global warming using social survey and climate data *, **
    Wei, Xiaoxiao
    Bohnett, Eve
    An, Li
    METHODSX, 2025, 14
  • [9] Visualizing Spatial Heterogeneity of Western U.S. Climate Variability
    Shinker, Jacqueline J.
    EARTH INTERACTIONS, 2010, 14 : 1 - 15
  • [10] Comparison of CMIP6 historical climate simulations and future projected warming to an empirical model of global climate
    McBride, Laura A.
    Hope, Austin P.
    Canty, Timothy P.
    Bennett, Brian F.
    Tribett, Walter R.
    Salawitch, Ross J.
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2021, 12 (02) : 545 - 579