Use of biomarkers in epidemiologic studies: minimizing the influence of measurement error in the study design and analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Shelley S. Tworoger
Susan E. Hankinson
机构
[1] Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School,Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine
[2] Harvard School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
来源
Cancer Causes & Control | 2006年 / 17卷
关键词
Biomarker; Assay; Epidemiologic studies; Methods; Serum; Plasma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The inclusion of biomarkers measured on the continuous scale, such as endogenous sex hormones or antioxidant levels, has become common in epidemiologic studies, and introduces additional sources of error that are specific to biomarkers. This includes error associated with specimen collection, processing, and storage; laboratory error (both within and between batch); and variability in the biomarker levels over time within an individual. In this review, we discuss and recommend study design and analytic strategies to deal with these sources of measurement error. In particular we describe methods to prevent or minimize some sources of error through appropriate sample collection and storage, communication with the laboratory, proper batching of samples, and participant matching. We also discuss how to quantify error related to biomarkers, focusing on issues of quality control, pilot studies, and how to measure within-person stability over time. Further, we discuss analytic issues for dealing with laboratory and within-person variability. Finally we recommend that journals standardize the reporting of biomarker assays in scientific manuscripts.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 899
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of biomarkers in epidemiologic studies: minimizing the influence of measurement error in the study design and analysis
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2006, 17 (07) : 889 - 899
  • [2] INFLUENCE OF BIOMARKERS ON THE DESIGN, METHODS, AND INTERPRETATION OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES
    HULKA, BS
    GARRETT, P
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1993, 40 (2-3): : 389 - 389
  • [3] THE EFFECT OF EXPOSURE VARIANCE AND EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT ERROR ON STUDY SAMPLE-SIZE - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES
    WHITE, E
    KUSHI, LH
    PEPE, MS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (08) : 873 - 880
  • [5] Measurement Error in Epidemiologic Studies of Air Pollution Based on Land-Use Regression Models
    Basagana, Xavier
    Aguilera, Inmaculada
    Rivera, Marcela
    Agis, David
    Foraster, Maria
    Marrugat, Jaume
    Elosua, Roberto
    Kuenzli, Nino
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 178 (08) : 1342 - 1346
  • [6] RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF NUTRITIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES WITH MEASUREMENT ERRORS IN THE EXPOSURE VARIABLES
    KOHLMEIER, L
    ARMINGER, G
    CLAYTON, D
    JOCKEL, KH
    KARG, G
    KEIDING, N
    KROMHOUT, D
    PIETINEN, P
    WAHRENDORF, J
    BELLACH, B
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1993, 47 : S53 - S57
  • [7] Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies
    van Smeden, Maarten
    de Vries, Bas B. L. Penning
    Nab, Linda
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 131 : 89 - 100
  • [8] CONDITIONAL-INDEPENDENCE MODELS FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES WITH COVARIATE MEASUREMENT ERROR
    RICHARDSON, S
    GILKS, WR
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (18) : 1703 - 1722
  • [9] THE DESIGN OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC CATCHMENT-AREA SURVEYS - THE CONTROL AND MEASUREMENT OF ERROR
    EATON, WW
    HOLZER, CE
    VONKORFF, M
    ANTHONY, JC
    HELZER, JE
    GEORGE, L
    BURNAM, MA
    BOYD, JH
    KESSLER, LG
    LOCKE, BZ
    ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1984, 41 (10) : 942 - 948
  • [10] Pesticide exposure assessment and dose prediction modelling for epidemiologic research: Implications of measurement error for epidemiologic study design and interpretation of results.
    Harris, SA
    Sass-Kortsak, AM
    Corey, PN
    Purdham, JT
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 223 : U53 - U53