The measurement of opportunity inequality: a cardinality-based approach

被引:0
|
作者
Efe A. Ok
Laurence Kranich
机构
[1] Department of Economics,
[2] New York University,undefined
[3] 269 Mercer Street,undefined
[4] New York,undefined
[5] NY 10003,undefined
[6] USA (e-mail: okefe@fasecon.econ.nyu.edu),undefined
[7] Departamento de Economia,undefined
[8] Universidad Carlos III de Madrid,undefined
[9] Calle Madrid 126,undefined
[10] E-28903 Getafe (Madrid),undefined
[11] Spain (e-mail: lkranich@eco.uc3m.es),undefined
来源
Social Choice and Welfare | 1998年 / 15卷
关键词
Social Welfare; Income Inequality; Fundamental Theorem; Social Welfare Function; Finite Sequence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We consider the problem of ranking distributions of opportunity sets on the basis of equality. First, conditional on a given ranking of individual opportunity sets, we define the notion of an equalizing transformation. Then, assuming that the opportunity sets are ranked according to the cardinality ordering, we formulate the analogues of the notions of the Lorenz partial ordering, equalizing (Dalton) transfers, and inequality averse social welfare functions – concepts which play a central role in the literature on income inequality. Our main result is a cardinality-based analogue of the fundamental theorem of inequality measurement: one distribution Lorenz dominates another if and only if the former can be obtained from the latter by a finite sequence of rank preserving equalizations, and if and only if the former is ranked higher than the latter by all inequality averse social welfare functions. In addition, we characterize the smallest monotonic and transitive extension of our cardinality-based Lorenz inequality ordering.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 287
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The measurement of opportunity inequality: a cardinality-based approach
    Ok, EA
    Kranich, L
    SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1998, 15 (02) : 263 - 287
  • [2] Cardinality-based equality of opportunities
    Alcalde-Unzu J.
    Arlegi R.
    Nieto J.
    Review of Economic Design, 2007, 10 (4) : 285 - 304
  • [3] On rational cardinality-based inclusion measures
    De Baets, B
    De Meyer, H
    Naessens, H
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 128 (02) : 169 - 183
  • [4] Cardinality-Based Variability Modeling with AutomationML
    Wimmer, Manuel
    Novak, Petr
    Sindelar, Radek
    Berardinelli, Luca
    Mayerhofer, Tanja
    Mazak, Alexandra
    2017 22ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2017,
  • [5] On rational cardinality-based inclusion measures
    De Baets, B.
    De Meyer, H.
    Naessens, H.
    2002, Elsevier (128)
  • [6] Note about cardinality-based circumscription
    Moinard, Y
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 119 (1-2) : 259 - 273
  • [7] Itemset generalization with cardinality-based constraints
    Cagliero, Luca
    Garza, Paolo
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 244 : 161 - 174
  • [8] An Accurate Solution to the Cardinality-Based Punctuality Problem
    Cao, Zhiguang
    Wu, Yaoxin
    Rao, Akshay
    Klanner, Felix
    Erschen, Stefan
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Le
    Guo, Hongliang
    IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2020, 12 (04) : 78 - 91
  • [9] On the evaluation of cardinality-based generalized yes/no queries
    Bosc, Patrick
    Lietard, Nadia
    Pivert, Olivier
    2006 3RD INTERNATIONAL IEEE CONFERENCE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 198 - 203
  • [10] A class of rational cardinality-based similarity measures
    De Baets, B
    De Meyer, H
    Naessens, H
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2001, 132 (01) : 51 - 69