Comparison of high-field (1.5 T) and low-field (0.2 T) MR imaging for the reliability of meniscal diagnosis

被引:0
|
作者
T. Rand
H. Imhof
M. Breitenseher
B. Happel
K. Turetschek
B. Schneider
S. Trattnig
机构
[1] Einrichtung für Magnetresonanztomographie,
[2] Universität Wien,undefined
[3] Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik,undefined
[4] Wien,undefined
[5] Institut für medizinische Statistik,undefined
[6] Ludwig Boltzmann-Institut für radiologische Tumordiagnostik,undefined
[7] Universität Wien,undefined
来源
Der Radiologe | 1997年 / 37卷
关键词
Key words Low field strength MR imaging • Meniscus • Diagnostic reliability; Schlüsselwörter Niederfeld-MRT • Meniskusdiagnostik • Sicherheit der subjektiven Entscheidungsfindung;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 806
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of high-field (1.5 T) and low-field (0.2 T) MR imaging for the reliability of meniscal diagnosis
    Rand, T
    Imhof, H
    Breitenseher, M
    Happel, B
    Turetschek, K
    Schneider, B
    Trattnig, S
    RADIOLOGE, 1997, 37 (10): : 802 - 806
  • [2] Comparison of high-field (1.5 T) and low-field (0.2 T) MR imaging for the reliability of meniscal diagnosis (vol 37, pg 802, 1997)
    Rand, T
    Imhof, H
    Breitenseher, M
    Happel, B
    Turetschek, K
    Schneider, B
    Vogele, T
    Kukla, C
    Trattnig, S
    RADIOLOGE, 1998, 38 (03): : 193 - 193
  • [3] MR arthrography of the shoulder: Comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging
    Loew, R
    Kreitner, KF
    Runkel, M
    Zoellner, J
    Thelen, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 158 - 158
  • [4] MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging
    Loew, R
    Kreitner, KF
    Runkel, M
    Zoellner, J
    Thelen, M
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (06) : 989 - 996
  • [5] MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0,2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging
    R. Loew
    K. F. Kreitner
    M. Runkel
    J. Zoellner
    M. Thelen
    European Radiology, 2000, 10 : 989 - 996
  • [7] COMPARISON OF LOW-FIELD VERSUS HIGH-FIELD MR-IMAGING
    DESPLANTES, BGZ
    KOSTER, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 20 (02) : 156 - 157
  • [8] COMPARISON OF LOW-FIELD VERSUS HIGH-FIELD MR-IMAGING - REPLY
    PARIZEL, PM
    DIJKSTRA, HAJ
    VANWIECHEN, PJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 20 (02) : 157 - 158
  • [9] Extent of brain tumor resection using high-field (1.5-T) versus low-field (0.2-T) intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging
    Bergsneider, M
    Sehati, N
    Villablanca, P
    McArthur, D
    Liau, LM
    NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 55 (02) : 483 - 484
  • [10] Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the differentiation of torned from intact menisci
    Rand, T
    Imhof, H
    Turetschek, K
    Schneider, B
    Vögele, T
    Gäbler, C
    Trattnig, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 30 (01) : 22 - 27