A BDI agent programming language with failure handling, declarative goals, and planning

被引:0
|
作者
Sebastian Sardina
Lin Padgham
机构
[1] RMIT University,School of Computer Science and IT
来源
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems | 2011年 / 23卷
关键词
BDI agent-oriented programming; Goal reasoning; HTN planning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Agents are an important technology that have the potential to take over contemporary methods for analysing, designing, and implementing complex software. The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agent paradigm has proven to be one of the major approaches to intelligent agent systems, both in academia and in industry. Typical BDI agent-oriented programming languages rely on user-provided “plan libraries” to achieve goals, and online context sensitive subgoal selection and expansion. These allow for the development of systems that are extremely flexible and responsive to the environment, and as a result, well suited for complex applications with (soft) real-time reasoning and control requirements. Nonetheless, complex decision making that goes beyond, but is compatible with, run-time context-dependent plan selection is one of the most natural and important next steps within this technology. In this paper we develop a typical BDI-style agent-oriented programming language that enhances usual BDI programming style with three distinguished features: declarative goals, look-ahead planning, and failure handling. First, an account that mixes both procedural and declarative aspects of goals is necessary in order to reason about important properties of goals and to decouple plans from what these plans are meant to achieve. Second, lookahead deliberation about the effects of one choice of expansion over another is clearly desirable or even mandatory in many circumstances so as to guarantee goal achievability and to avoid undesired situations. Finally, a failure handling mechanism, suitably integrated with both declarative goals and planning, is required in order to model an adequate level of commitment to goals, as well as to be consistent with most real BDI implemented systems.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 70
页数:52
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A BDI agent programming language with failure handling, declarative goals, and planning
    Sardina, Sebastian
    Padgham, Lin
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 23 (01) : 18 - 70
  • [2] Dynamics of declarative goals in agent programming
    van Riemsdijk, MB
    Dastani, M
    Dignum, F
    Meyer, JJC
    DECLARATIVE AGENT LANGUAGES AND TECHNOLOGIES II, 2005, 3476 : 1 - 18
  • [3] A Declarative Agent Programming Language Based on Action Theories
    Drescher, Conrad
    Schiffel, Stephan
    Thielscher, Michael
    FRONTIERS OF COMBINING SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5749 : 230 - 245
  • [4] Retire superman: Handling exceptions seamlessly in a declarative visual programming language
    vanZee, P
    Burnett, M
    Chesire, M
    IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON VISUAL LANGUAGES, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 222 - 230
  • [5] Declarative programming for agent applications
    J. W. Lloyd
    K. S. Ng
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2011, 23 : 224 - 272
  • [6] Declarative programming for agent applications
    Lloyd, J. W.
    Ng, K. S.
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 23 (02) : 224 - 272
  • [7] A language for declarative robotic programming
    Peterson, J
    Hager, GD
    Hudak, P
    ICRA '99: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 1144 - 1151
  • [8] Language for declarative robotic programming
    Peterson, John
    Hager, Gregory D.
    Hudak, Paul
    Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1999, 2 : 1144 - 1151
  • [9] Programming declarative goals using plan patterns
    Hubner, Jomi F.
    Bordini, Rafael H.
    Wooldridge, Michael
    DECLARATIVE AGENT LANGUAGES AND TECHNOLOGIES IV, 2006, 4237 : 123 - 140
  • [10] Quantifying the Completeness of Goals in BDI Agent Systems
    Thangarajah, John
    Harland, James
    Morley, David N.
    Yorke-Smith, Neil
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014), 2014, 263 : 879 - +