Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?

被引：0
|
作者：
Martha J. Farah
Judy Illes
Robert Cook-Deegan
Howard Gardner
Eric Kandel
Patricia King
Eric Parens
Barbara Sahakian
Paul Root Wolpe
机构：
[1] the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience,the Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy and Department of Public Policy Studies
[2] University of Pennsylvania,the Department of Psychiatry
[3] the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and the Department of Radiology,the Departments of Psychiatry
[4] Center for Genome Ethics,undefined
[5] Law and Policy,undefined
[6] Duke University,undefined
[7] Room 127C,undefined
[8] North Building,undefined
[9] the Graduate School of Education,undefined
[10] Harvard University,undefined
[11] the Center for Neurobiology and Behavior,undefined
[12] Columbia University and Howard Hughes Medical Institute,undefined
[13] the Georgetown University Law Center,undefined
[14] the The Hastings Center,undefined
[15] University of Cambridge,undefined
[16] Addenbrooke's Hospital,undefined
[17] Medical Ethics,undefined
[18] and Sociology,undefined
[19] Center for Bioethics,undefined
[20] University of Pennsylvania,undefined
来源：
Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2004年 / 5卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Our growing ability to alter brain function can be used to enhance the mental processes of normal individuals as well as to treat mental dysfunction in people who are ill. The prospect of neurocognitive enhancement raises many issues about what is safe, fair and otherwise morally acceptable. This article resulted from a meeting on neurocognitive enhancement that was held by the authors. Our goal is to review the state of the art in neurocognitive enhancement, its attendant social and ethical problems, and the ways in which society can address these problems.
引用
收藏
页码：421 / 425
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
12345