Systems-Based Analysis of China-Tianjin Port Fire and Explosion: A Comparison of HFACS, AcciMap, and STAMP

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Jing L. [1 ]
Sun C. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao
关键词
AcciMap; China-Tianjin Port fire and explosion; Human factor analysis and classification system (HFACS); System theoretic accident modeling and process (STAMP); Systems-based analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11668-018-0534-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China-Tianjin Port fire and explosion on August 12, 2015, was a major accident that involved hazardous chemicals and resulted in 165 fatalities and 798 injuries. Three-system-based accident models, human factor analysis and classification system (HFACS), AcciMap, and system theoretic accident modeling and process (STAMP), were applied to identify contributory factors and relationships in the accident. The analysis outputs and usage of the three techniques were compared. The three-system accident models show several differences in terms of the emphasis on the models, system structure, classification of contributory factors, and interactions between system components. An important advantage of HFACS is the taxonomic nature, which can be easily applied in practical application. AcciMap provides a clear graphic representation of the causal flow of accidents, which is suitable for academic research. STAMP is suitable for both academic research and practical applications. © 2018, ASM International.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1400
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Systems-based Analysis on the China-Tianjin Port Fire and Explosion
    Zhang, Yingyu
    Guo, Weiqun
    Sun, Chang
    Jing, Linlin
    EKOLOJI, 2019, 28 (107): : 1921 - 1928
  • [2] Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP
    Salmon, Paul M.
    Cornelissen, Miranda
    Trotter, Margaret J.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (04) : 1158 - 1170
  • [3] A new insight into the accident investigation: A case study of Tianjin Port fire and explosion in China
    Zhou Aitao
    Fan Lingpeng
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2017, 36 (04) : 362 - 367
  • [4] Analysis of medication dosing error related to Computerised Provider Order Entry system: A comparison of ECF, HFACS, STAMP and AcciMap approaches
    Igene, Oseghale Osezua
    Johnson, Christopher
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (02) : 1017 - 1042
  • [5] Analysis of Ocular Injury Characteristics in Survivors of the 8.12 Tianjin Port Explosion, China
    Jiang, Hao
    Xue, Chao
    Gao, Yanlin
    Wang, Yan
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [6] Human and organizational factors in Chinese hazardous chemical accidents: a case study of the '8.12' Tianjin Port fire and explosion using the HFACS-HC
    Zhou, Lin
    Fu, Gui
    Xue, Yujingyang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2018, 24 (03) : 329 - 340
  • [7] Analysis of Emergency Medical Rescue in the "8-12" Tianjin Port Heavy Fire Explosion Accident
    Dong, Wenlong
    Jin, Jie
    Lu, Ming
    Ding, Hui
    Lv, Qi
    Fan, Haojun
    Hou, Shike
    Fan, Bin
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (02) : 237 - 242
  • [8] Conflict Analysis in Redevelopment of Brownfield Caused by Contingency: Tianjin Port "8.12" Explosion Hazard, in China
    Li, Xia
    Zhu, Yuming
    Shi, Yumeng
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2016, : 1106 - 1110
  • [9] A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident
    Wu, Chao
    Huang, Lang
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 182 : 73 - 85
  • [10] Public Opinion Analysis of Emergency on Weibo Based on Improved CSIM: The Case of Tianjin Port Explosion
    Lu, Yonghe
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Zhu, Hou
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, 2019, 868 : 973 - 997