A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm

被引:0
|
作者
Dora Matzke
Jonathon Love
Andrew Heathcote
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Tasmania,School of Medicine, Division of Psychology
[3] University of Newcastle,School of Psychology
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2017年 / 49卷
关键词
Bayesian hierarchical modeling; Ex-Gaussian distribution; Response inhibition; Stop-signal paradigm; Stop-signal RT distribution; Trigger failure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Response inhibition is frequently investigated using the stop-signal paradigm, where participants perform a two-choice response time task that is occasionally interrupted by a stop signal instructing them to withhold their response. Stop-signal performance is formalized as a race between a go and a stop process. If the go process wins, the response is executed; if the stop process wins, the response is inhibited. Successful inhibition requires fast stop responses and a high probability of triggering the stop process. Existing methods allow for the estimation of the latency of the stop response, but are unable to identify deficiencies in triggering the stop process. We introduce a Bayesian model that addresses this limitation and enables researchers to simultaneously estimate the probability of trigger failures and the entire distribution of stopping latencies. We demonstrate that trigger failures are clearly present in two previous studies, and that ignoring them distorts estimates of stopping latencies. The parameter estimation routine is implemented in the BEESTS software (Matzke et al., Front. Quantitative Psych. Measurement, 4, 918; 2013a) and is available at http://dora.erbe-matzke.com/software.html.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 281
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Bayesian approach for estimating the probability of trigger failures in the stop-signal paradigm
    Matzke, Dora
    Love, Jonathon
    Heathcote, Andrew
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2017, 49 (01) : 267 - 281
  • [2] An ERP investigation of varying stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm
    Dimoska, A
    Johnstone, SJ
    Barry, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 54 (1-2) : 33 - 34
  • [3] Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: The insula and the significance of failed inhibition
    Ramautar, Jennifer R.
    Slagter, Heleen A.
    Kok, Albert
    Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1105 : 143 - 154
  • [4] Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated
    Ramautar, JR
    Kok, A
    Ridderinkhof, KR
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2004, 56 (02) : 234 - 252
  • [5] Stop-signal probability impacts proactive and reactive response inhibition in a stop-signal task
    Xu, Tiange
    Zhang, Meng
    Chen, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 220 - 221
  • [6] STOP IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Stevens, Michael A.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2008, 40 (02) : 479 - 483
  • [7] Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    Logan, Gordon D.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (11) : 418 - 424
  • [8] Reconsidering electrophysiological markers of response inhibition in light of trigger failures in the stop-signal task
    Skippen, P.
    Fulham, W. R.
    Michie, P. T.
    Matzke, D.
    Heathcote, A.
    Karayanidis, F.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 (10)
  • [9] P3 AND THE STOP-SIGNAL PARADIGM
    OVERTOOM, CCE
    KEMNER, C
    VERBATEN, MN
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 32 : S57 - S57
  • [10] Towards Dependent Race Models for the Stop-Signal Paradigm: The Copula Approach
    Colonius H.
    Jahansa P.
    Joe H.
    Diederich A.
    Computational Brain & Behavior, 2024, 7 (2) : 255 - 267