Optimal Groundwater Remediation Under Uncertainty Using Multi-objective Optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Aristotelis Mantoglou
George Kourakos
机构
[1] National Technical University of Athens,Department of Rural and Surveying Engineering
来源
关键词
groundwater remediation; multi-objective optimization; Monte Carlo simulation; uncertain hydraulic conductivity; critical realizations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A methodology is developed for optimal remediation of groundwater aquifers under hydraulic conductivity uncertainty. A multi-objective management method based on a pump-and-treat remediation technology, is proposed. The pumping rates and well locations are the decision variables and two objectives are chosen: minimization of contaminated groundwater in the aquifer and minimization of remediation cost. A Monte Carlo simulation method is used to cope with hydraulic conductivity uncertainty. A number of equally probable realizations of hydraulic conductivity are created and a Pareto front is obtained using a modified multi-objective Genetic Algorithm. A penalty function is utilized to maintain the algebraic sum of pumping and recharging rates equal to zero. Since Monte Carlo simulations are CPU time consuming, a method is proposed to identify the few significant realizations which have an effect on the optimal solution (critical realizations). A Pareto front with an assigned probability is derived, so that the decision maker can make decisions with specified reliability. In a case study with 100 realizations, only 11 realizations were found critical and need be considered. The remaining 89 realizations consistently obtain low ranks for all designs considered and do not affect decisions at 95% reliability level. Thus these realizations need not be considered which implies a 89% savings in computer time. The designs obtained using the critical realizations, retain a similar reliability for new realizations not considered in the design process.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 847
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty using multi-objective optimization
    Mantoglou, Aristotelis
    Kourakos, George
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (05) : 835 - 847
  • [2] A Probablisitic Multi-objective Management Model for Groundwater Remediation Under Uncertainty
    Yang, Yun
    Yang, Lei
    Cai, Dong
    2015 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION (ICNC), 2015, : 325 - 329
  • [3] Multi-objective optimization for optimal groundwater remediation design and management systems
    Thangjam Somchand Singh
    Dibakar Chakrabarty
    Geosciences Journal, 2010, 14 : 87 - 97
  • [4] Multi-objective optimization for optimal groundwater remediation design and management systems
    Singh, Thangjam Somchand
    Chakrabarty, Dibakar
    GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2010, 14 (01) : 87 - 97
  • [5] Optimal design of groundwater remediation system using a probabilistic multi-objective fast harmony search algorithm under uncertainty
    Luo, Qiankun
    Wu, Jianfeng
    Yang, Yun
    Qian, Jiazhong
    Wu, Jichun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 519 : 3305 - 3315
  • [6] Reliability-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Groundwater Remediation
    Rezaei, Hossein
    Bozorg-Haddad, Omid
    Loaiciga, Hugo
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (10) : 3079 - 3097
  • [7] Reliability-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Groundwater Remediation
    Hossein Rezaei
    Omid Bozorg-Haddad
    Hugo A. Loáiciga
    Water Resources Management, 2020, 34 : 3079 - 3097
  • [8] Groundwater management under uncertainty: A multi-objective approach
    Ndambuki, JM
    Otieno, FAO
    Stroet, CBM
    Veling, EJM
    WATER SA, 2000, 26 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [9] Optimal design of groundwater remediation systems using a multi-objective fast harmony search algorithm
    Luo, Qiankun
    Wu, Jianfeng
    Sun, Xiaomin
    Yang, Yun
    Wu, Jichun
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 20 (08) : 1497 - 1510
  • [10] Multi-objective optimization for repetitive scheduling under uncertainty
    Salama, Tarek
    Moselhi, Osama
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (07) : 1294 - 1320