False-negative results after stereotactically guided vacuum biopsy

被引:0
|
作者
D. Peter
J. Grünhagen
R. Wenke
F. K. W. Schäfer
I. Schreer
机构
[1] University Schleswig-Holstein,Breast Center, Department of Radiology and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
[2] Campus Kiel,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Vacuum biopsy; Breast neoplasm; Quality assurance; Mammography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the false negative rate of stereotactically guided vacuum biopsy (VB). Data of patients with benign lesions in VB were evaluated retrospectively during a median follow-up period of 21 months. A total of 404 VB were considered benign and representative and were recommended for follow-up. Of these 404 lesions, 195 were completely removed radiologically. Follow-up data were available for 354/404 patients (87.6%), with intervals ranging from 3 to 66 months (median 21, mean 22.4). Reintervention or surgery was necessary in 13/354 (3.7%) cases. Of these cases, 5/354 (1.4%) turned out to be false negatives. Four of these cases showed large areas of microcalcifications or several clusters, and only partial removal was possible due to the size of the lesions.Although VB is an accurate procedure for diagnosing nonpalpable breast lesions with a low cancer miss rate, we consider the exclusion of malignancy in cases of disseminated microcalcifications or several clusters as a limitation. The radiologic-pathologic correlation in these cases is a challenge, particularly in terms of the residuals. Strict follow-up of benign lesions is essential to avoid delayed cancer diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 182
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] False-negative results after stereotactically guided vacuum biopsy
    Peter, D.
    Gruenhagen, J.
    Wenke, R.
    Schaefer, F. K. W.
    Schreer, I.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) : 177 - 182
  • [2] FOCAL REJECTION - A CAUSE OF FALSE-NEGATIVE BIOPSY RESULTS
    SCHUTZ, A
    BRANDL, U
    BREUER, M
    ENGELHARDT, M
    KEMKES, BM
    REICHART, B
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1993, 25 (01) : 1369 - 1370
  • [3] Management of patients with residual microcalcifications and false-negative results after stereotactic vacuum - assisted biopsy of mammographic suspicious microcalcifications
    Georgiou, E.
    Milatou, M.
    Kritikos, N.
    Kinoglou, G.
    BREAST, 2021, 56 : S72 - S72
  • [4] Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy
    Ji Hyun Youk
    Eun-Kyung Kim
    Min Jung Kim
    Jin Young Kwak
    Eun Ju Son
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 782 - 789
  • [5] Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kwak, Jin Young
    Son, Eun Ju
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 782 - 789
  • [6] Pseudobenign prostate carcinomas: causes of false-negative biopsy results
    Dema, Alis
    Taban, Sorina
    Lazar, Elena
    Borda, Angela
    Lazureanu, Codruta
    Herman, Diana
    Muresan, Anca
    Cornianu, Marioara
    Anderco, Denisa
    Loghin, Andrada
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2011, 52 (03): : 963 - 974
  • [7] False-Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy
    Omgo E. Nieweg
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 2089 - 2091
  • [8] FALSE-NEGATIVE TEMPORAL ARTERY BIOPSY
    ASHTONKEY, MR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1992, 16 (06) : 634 - 635
  • [9] False-negative core biopsy of the breast
    Racenstein, MJ
    Berlin, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) : 927 - 930
  • [10] False-Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy
    Nieweg, Omgo E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (08) : 2089 - 2091