共 9 条
- [2] Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles—how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators? Scientometrics, 2013, 97 : 287 - 315
- [4] Comments on the article "Brazil's growing production of scientific articles-how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators?" by Elenara Chaves Edler de Almeida and Jorge Almeida Guimares: Scientometrics (2013) 97:287-315. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0967-y SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (03) : 2077 - 2078
- [5] Comments on the article “Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles-how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators?” by Elenara Chaves Edler de Almeida and Jorge Almeida Guimarães: Scientometrics (2013) 97:287–315. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0967-y Scientometrics, 2014, 101 : 2077 - 2078
- [6] User comments about research findings: How conflictual information in online science journalistic articles influences laypeople's understanding of scientific tentativeness COMMUNICATIONS-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (04): : 465 - 480
- [7] Welcome to the August issue of the Technology Innovation Management Review. We invite your comments on the articles in this issue as well as suggestions for future article topics and issue themes TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 10 (08): : 3 - 3
- [8] Articles on GLP-1 therapy: How important is an accurate peer-review process? A Manuscript Peer-Review Process was to leave on numerous Major scientific comments DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2011, 20 (03): : 163 - 169
- [9] Can’t bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not workA comment on G. Madison and T. Söderlund: Comparisons of scientific quality indicators across peer-reviewed journal articles with more or less gender perspective: Gender studies can do better Scientometrics, 2018, 117 : 655 - 666