Multidisciplinary multifidelity optimisation of a flexible wing aerofoil with reference to a small UAV

被引:1
|
作者
M. Berci
V. V. Toropov
R. W. Hewson
P. H. Gaskell
机构
[1] University of Leeds,School of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Queen Mary University of London,School of Engineering and Materials Science
[3] Imperial College,Department of Aeronautics
[4] University of Durham,School of Engineering and Computing
关键词
Multidisciplinary; Multifidelity; Optimisation; Flexible aerofoil; Small UAV;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The preliminary Multidisciplinary Design and Optimisation of a flexible wing aerofoil apropos a small Unmanned Air Vehicle is performed using a multifidelity model-based strategy. Both the passively adaptive structure and the shape of the flexible wing aerofoil are optimised for best aerodynamic performance under aero-structural constraints, within a coupled aeroelastic formulation. A typical flight mission for surveillance purposes is considered and includes the potential occurrence of wind gusts. A metamodel for the high-fidelity objective function and each of the constraints is built, based on a tuned low-fidelity one, in order to improve the efficiency of the optimisation process. Both metamodels are based on solutions of the aeroelastic equations for a flexible aerofoil but employ different levels of complexity and computational cost for modelling aerodynamics and structural dynamics within a modal approach. The high-fidelity model employs nonlinear Computational Fluid Dynamics coupled with a full set of structural modes, whereas the low-fidelity one employs linear thin aerofoil theory coupled with a reduced set of structural modes. The low-fidelity responses are then corrected according to few high-fidelity responses, as prescribed by an appropriate Design of Experiment, by means of a suitable tuning technique. A standard Genetic Algorithm is hence utilised to find the global optimum, showing that a flexible aerofoil is characterised by higher aerodynamic efficiency than its rigid counterpart. Wing weight reduction is also accomplished when a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm is adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 699
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multidisciplinary multifidelity optimisation of a flexible wing aerofoil with reference to a small UAV
    Berci, M.
    Toropov, V. V.
    Hewson, R. W.
    Gaskell, P. H.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 50 (04) : 683 - 699
  • [2] Multifidelity Sensitivity Study of Subsonic Wing Flutter for Hybrid Approaches in Aircraft Multidisciplinary Design and Optimisation
    Berci, Marco
    Torrigiani, Francesco
    AEROSPACE, 2020, 7 (11) : 1 - 22
  • [3] Design of a turbulent wing for small aircraft using multidisciplinary optimisation
    Stalewski, W.
    Zoltak, J.
    ARCHIVES OF MECHANICS, 2014, 66 (03): : 185 - 201
  • [4] A multidisciplinary design optimization approach to preliminary wing design using multifidelity analysis
    Pilcher, Chris
    Chung, Joon
    Ringshandl, Michael
    Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, 2012, 58 (02): : 95 - 104
  • [5] Multidisciplinary design optimisation of an aircraft wing by applying a hybrid optimisation strategy
    Barth, T
    Schneider, G
    Stettner, M
    Grauer, M
    Hoernlein, H
    Kereku, E
    OPTIMAIZATION IN INDUSTRY, 2002, : 289 - 301
  • [6] Multidisciplinary wing design of a light long endurance UAV
    Grendysa, Wojciech
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 91 (06): : 905 - 914
  • [8] Multidisciplinary Optimisation of an eVTOL UAV With a Hydrogen Fuel Cell
    Alves, Bernardo
    Marta, Andre
    Felix, Luis
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2022, : 134 - 143
  • [9] A multidisciplinary robust optimisation framework for UAV conceptual design
    Nguyen, N. Van
    Lee, J. -W.
    Lee, Y. -D.
    Park, H. -U.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 118 (1200): : 123 - 142
  • [10] Flexible Wing Optimisation Based on Shapes and Structures
    Barnewitz, Holger
    MEGADESIGN AND MEGAOPT - GERMAN INITIATIVES FOR AERODYNAMIC SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION IN AIRCRAFT DESIGN, 2009, 107 : 287 - 305