Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview

被引:0
|
作者
Andrew H. Hales
Eric D. Wesselmann
Joseph Hilgard
机构
[1] University of Virginia,Frank Batten School of Public Policy and Leadership
[2] Illinois State University,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
Replication; Reproducibility; Preregistration; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ability to independently verify and replicate observations made by other researchers is a hallmark of science. In this article, we provide an overview of recent discussions concerning replicability and best practices in mainstream psychology with an emphasis on the practical benefists to both researchers and the field as a whole. We first review challenges individual researchers face in producing research that is both publishable and reliable. We then suggest methods for producing more accurate research claims, such as transparently disclosing how results were obtained and analyzed, preregistering analysis plans, and publicly posting original data and materials. We also discuss ongoing changes at the institutional level to incentivize stronger research. These include officially recognizing open science practices at the journal level, disconnecting the publication decision from the results of a study, training students to conduct replications, and publishing replications. We conclude that these open science practices afford exciting low-cost opportunities to improve the quality of psychological science.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 31
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview
    Hales, Andrew H.
    Wesselmann, Eric D.
    Hilgard, Joseph
    PERSPECTIVES ON BEHAVIOR SCIENCE, 2019, 42 (01) : 13 - 31
  • [2] Transparency and openness in science
    Sanders, Jeremy
    Blundy, Jon
    Donaldson, Anne
    Brown, Steve
    Ivison, Rob
    Padgett, Miles
    Padian, Kevin
    Rittinger, Katrin
    Rowe, Kerry
    Stace, Anthony
    Viding, Essi
    Chambers, Chris
    Chaplain, Mark
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2017, 4 (01):
  • [3] Open Science Towards Greater Transparency and Openness in Science
    Maedche, Alexander
    Elshan, Edona
    Hoehle, Hartmut
    Lehrer, Christiane
    Recker, Jan
    Sunyaev, Ali
    Sturm, Benjamin
    Werth, Oliver
    BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2024, 66 (04) : 517 - 532
  • [4] Improving the Replicability of Psychological Science Through Pedagogy
    Hawkins, Robert X. D.
    Smith, Eric N.
    Au, Carolyn
    Arias, Juan Miguel
    Catapano, Rhia
    Hermann, Eric
    Keil, Martin
    Lampinen, Andrew
    Raposo, Sarah
    Reynolds, Jesse
    Salehi, Shima
    Salloum, Justin
    Tan, Jed
    Frank, Michael C.
    ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 1 (01) : 7 - 18
  • [5] Security Through Transparency and Openness in Computer Design
    Emanuilov, Ivo
    RISKS AND SECURITY OF INTERNET AND SYSTEMS (CRISIS 2020), 2021, 12528 : 105 - 116
  • [6] Promoting openness and transparency in mental health nursing science
    Gray, R.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2018, 25 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [7] Openness in Political Science: Data Access and Research Transparency
    Lupia, Arthur
    Elman, Colin
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2014, 47 (01) : 19 - 42
  • [8] Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency
    Chin, Jason M.
    Ibaviosa, Carlos M.
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2022, 62 (03) : 272 - 283
  • [9] Transparency Is Now the Default at Psychological Science
    Hardwicke, Tom E.
    Vazire, Simine
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 35 (07) : 708 - 711
  • [10] A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
    Klein, Olivier
    Hardwicket, Tom E.
    Aust, Frederik
    Breuer, Johannes
    Danielsson, Henrik
    Mohr, Alicia Hofelich
    IJzerman, Hans
    Nilsonne, Gustav
    Vanpaemel, Wolf
    Frank, Michael C.
    COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 4 (01)