Computer vision classification of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on deep transfer learning techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Yavuz Selim Taspinar
Musa Dogan
Ilkay Cinar
Ramazan Kursun
Ilker Ali Ozkan
Murat Koklu
机构
[1] Selcuk University,Doganhisar Vocational School
[2] Selcuk University,Department of Computer Engineering
[3] Selcuk University,Guneysinir Vocational School
来源
关键词
Dry bean; Deep features; Classification; Machine learning; Hybrid methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many types of haricot beans, the nutrient consumed all over the world. Each type differs in terms of features such as taste, size, economic value, etc. But even if they are different types, bean grains are frequently confused with each other. For these reasons, it is important to separate the bean grains of different species. For this purpose, a haricot bean dataset consisting of 33,064 images of 14 different bean types was created. By using these images, 3 different pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) were trained via the transfer learning method. Within the scope of the study, InceptionV3, VGG16, and VGG19 CNN models were used. These models were utilized for both end-to-end classification and extraction of image features. Firstly, the images were classified via Inception V3, VGG16, and VGG19 models. As a result of this classification, 84.48%, 80.63%, and 81.03% classification success were obtained from InceptionV3, VGG16, and VGG19 models, respectively. Secondly, the image features of these 3 models were taken from the layer just before the classification layer. Then, these features were given as input to the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (LR) models. Images were classified using six different models, InceptionV3 + SVM, VGG16 + SVM, VGG1 + SVM and InceptionV3 + LR, VGG16 + LR, VGG1 + LR. Classification successes obtained from InceptionV3 + SVM, VGG16 + SVM, and VGG19 + SVM were 79.60%, 81.97%, 80.64%, respectively. And, the classification successes obtained from InceptionV3 + LR, VGG16 + LR, and VGG19 + LR were 82.35%, 83.71%, and 83.54%, respectively. The InceptionV3, among all models, was determined to be the best classification model with a classification success of 84.48%. On the other hand, the model with the lowest classification success was determined to be the InceptionV3 + SVM. Detailed analysis of the created models was also carried out with precision, recall, and F-1 score metrics. It is thought that the proposed models can be used to distinguish haricot bean types in a quick and accurate way. Furthermore, the proposed computer vision methods can be combined with robotic systems and used to the distinction of bean types. By means of image processing, varieties can be determined on conveyor belts, and dry bean varieties can be purified with delta robots.
引用
收藏
页码:2707 / 2725
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computer vision classification of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on deep transfer learning techniques
    Taspinar, Yavuz Selim
    Dogan, Musa
    Cinar, Ilkay
    Kursun, Ramazan
    Ozkan, Ilker Ali
    Koklu, Murat
    EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 248 (11) : 2707 - 2725
  • [2] Volatile compounds of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Oomah, B. Dave
    Liang, Lisa S. Y.
    Balasubramanian, Parthiba
    PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION, 2007, 62 (04) : 177 - 183
  • [3] Volatile Compounds of Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    B. Dave Oomah
    Lisa S. Y. Liang
    Parthiba Balasubramanian
    Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2007, 62
  • [4] Responses of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to sulfentrazone
    Hekmat, Sharareh
    Shropshire, Christy
    Soltani, Nader
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2007, 26 (04) : 525 - 529
  • [5] SIMULATION OF THE RESPONSES OF DRY BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) TO IRRIGATION
    Espadafor, M.
    Couto, L.
    Resende, M.
    Henderson, D. W.
    Garcia-Vila, M.
    Fereres, E.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2017, 60 (06) : 1983 - 1994
  • [6] Multiclass classification of dry beans using computer vision and machine learning techniques
    Koklu, Murat
    Ozkan, Ilker Ali
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 174
  • [7] Nutritional and protein quality of dry Brazilian beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Rezende, Amanda Alves
    Bertoldo Pacheco, Maria Teresa
    Nunes da Silva, Vera Sonia
    Pinto de Castro Ferreira, Tania Aparecida
    FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 38 (03): : 421 - 427
  • [8] Conversion of starch from dry common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to ethanol
    Nichols, Nancy N.
    Sutivisedsak, Nongnuch
    Dien, Bruce S.
    Biswas, Atanu
    Lesch, William C.
    Cotta, Michael A.
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2011, 33 (03) : 644 - 647
  • [9] Rapid tests to assess the antioxidant activity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. dry beans
    Heimler, D
    Vignolini, P
    Dini, MG
    Romani, A
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2005, 53 (08) : 3053 - 3056
  • [10] Responses of various market classes of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to linuron
    Soltani, N
    Shropshire, C
    Sikkema, PH
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 118 - 122