Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies

被引:0
|
作者
Jurg Ott
Yoichiro Kamatani
Mark Lathrop
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Mental Health,
[2] Institute of Psychology,undefined
[3] Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[4] Fondation Jean Dausset – Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain,undefined
[5] CEA-IC-Centre National de Génotypage,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Genetics | 2011年 / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Linkage analysis has been hugely successful in identifying the genetic basis of many Mendelian disorders and the genetic contribution to some complex conditions. However, these approaches have been superseded in the past 15 years by association mapping and, more recently, by genome-wide association (GWA) studies.Present GWA approaches have difficulty detecting rare risk variants through linkage disequilibrium (LD) with common SNP markers; however, such variants can be found by linkage analysis. For example, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are the most predominant of the known breast cancer susceptibility genes, were previously identified through linkage analysis but have not been identified by GWA studies.Typical linkage study designs include: parent–offspring trios, affected sibling pairs (sib-pairs), unselected sib-pairs or related individuals selected from the extremes of a quantitative trait distribution (for example, concordant or discordant sib-pairs), extended pedigrees with multiple affected individuals, consanguineous families and families obtained from isolated populations.A combination of linkage and association methodologies should provide the most accurate and powerful approach for identifying and characterizing the full range of disease-susceptibility variants. Family study designs offer: the ability to enrich for genetic loci containing rare variants; methods to control for heterogeneity and population stratification; direct estimates of the genetic contribution of different loci; the opportunity to examine the transmission of variants with phenotypes; and the ability to reveal the effects of parental origin of alleles.The problem of population heterogeneity is essentially non-existent in linkage analysis, so it has been tempting to use related individuals in genetic association studies as they are necessarily of the same ethnic origin (family-based as opposed to population-based controls). Another advantage of using family-based controls is that only family-based data will potentially exhibit genotyping errors in the form of Mendelian inconsistencies.These considerations motivate the search for a general framework to evaluate linkage and association simultaneously, taking combinations of data from pedigrees with different relationship structures (such as extended pedigrees, sibships or transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) families) and case–control samples. Such an approach is likely to be the most powerful approach for identifying new genetic factors related to trait loci, beyond those that can be readily detected by GWA in case–control designs.Prime examples of traits for which linkage and association mapping have been essential are Crohn's disease and fetal haemoglobin levels in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Family-based designs for genome-wide association studies
    Ott, Jurg
    Kamatani, Yoichiro
    Lathrop, Mark
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (07) : 465 - 474
  • [2] The Role of Family-Based Designs in Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Laird, Nan M.
    Lange, Christoph
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 24 (04) : 388 - 397
  • [3] Joint Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Studies in Family-Based Designs
    Sha, Qiuying
    Zhang, Zhaogong
    Zhang, Shuanglin
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07):
  • [4] Family-based genome-wide association studies
    Benyamin, B.
    Visscher, P. M.
    McRae, A. F.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2009, 10 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [5] On the Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies in Family-Based Designs: A Universal, Robust Analysis Approach and an Application to Four Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Won, Sungho
    Wilk, Jemma B.
    Mathias, Rasika A.
    O'Donnell, Christopher J.
    Silverman, Edwin K.
    Barnes, Kathleen
    O'Connor, George T.
    Weiss, Scott T.
    Lange, Christoph
    PLOS GENETICS, 2009, 5 (11)
  • [6] Genome-wide association studies have problems due to confounding: Are family-based designs the answer?
    Young, Alexander Strudwick
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2024, 22 (04)
  • [7] Family-based genome-wide association study designs for increased power and robustness
    Guan, Junming
    Tan, Tammy
    Nehzati, Seyed Moeen
    Bennett, Michael
    Turley, Patrick
    Benjamin, Daniel J.
    Young, Alexander Strudwick
    NATURE GENETICS, 2025, : 1044 - 1052
  • [8] Family-based studies to the rescue of genome-wide association studies in renal function
    Pattaro, Cristian
    Saint-Pierre, Aude
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 83 (02) : 196 - 198
  • [9] On family-based genome-wide association studies with large pedigrees: observations and recommendations
    David W Fardo
    Xue Zhang
    Lili Ding
    Hua He
    Brad Kurowski
    Eileen S Alexander
    Tesfaye B Mersha
    Valentina Pilipenko
    Leah Kottyan
    Kannabiran Nandakumar
    Lisa Martin
    BMC Proceedings, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [10] Sandwich corrected standard errors in family-based genome-wide association studies
    Camelia C Minică
    Conor V Dolan
    Maarten M D Kampert
    Dorret I Boomsma
    Jacqueline M Vink
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2015, 23 : 388 - 394