Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: a bibliometric analysis

被引:0
作者
Jean A. Pratt
Karina Hauser
Cassidy R. Sugimoto
机构
[1] Schneider Social Science,Department of Information Systems
[2] University of Wisconsin at Eau Claire,Management Information Systems
[3] Utah State University,School of Library and Information Science
[4] Indiana University Bloomington,undefined
来源
Scientometrics | 2012年 / 93卷
关键词
Bibliometric; Information systems; Business; Interdisciplinarity; Citation analysis; Knowledge exchange;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Information systems permeate every business function, thereby requiring holistic Information Systems (IS) approaches. Much academic research is still discipline specific. More interdisciplinary research is needed to inform both industry and academe. Interdisciplinary research has been positively associated with increased levels of innovation, productivity and impact. IS research contributes to the knowledge creation and innovation within IS and other College of Business (COB) disciplines. This research defines the intellectual structures within IS and between IS and other COB disciplines. We use a large scale, diachronic bibliometric analysis of COB journals to assess reciprocal knowledge exchange and also to identify potential intra- and interdisciplinary publication outlets. Our findings show an increase in IS knowledge contributions to other COB disciplines, which supports the discussion that IS is a reference discipline. Our research also visually depicts the intellectual structures within IS and between IS and other COB disciplines. Anyone exploring research in IS and allied COB disciplines can peruse the proximity maps to identify groups of similar journals. The findings from this research inform decisions related to which journals to read, target as publication outlets, and include on promotion and tenure lists.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 304
页数:25
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Acedo FJ(2006)Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis Journal of Management Studies 43 957-983
  • [2] Balsiger PW(2004)Supradisciplinary research practices: History, objectives and rationale Futures 36 407-421
  • [3] Baskerville RL(2002)Information systems as a reference discipline MIS Quarterly 26 1-14
  • [4] Myers MD(2009)Fashion waves in information systems research and practice MIS Quarterly 33 647-662
  • [5] Baskerville RL(2006)Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis Omega 34 359-371
  • [6] Myers MD(2008)Analysis of interdisciplinary faculty job postings by institutional type, rank, and discipline The Journal of the Professoriate 5 1-31
  • [7] Biehl M(2006)Information systems citation patterns from international conference on information systems articles Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 1263-1274
  • [8] Kim H(2002)Measuring researcher production in information systems Journal of the Association for Information Systems 3 145-215
  • [9] Wade M(1986)Research in management information systems 1980–1984: Points of work and reference MIS Quarterly 10 289-302
  • [10] Borrego M(2006)Research standards for promotion and tenure in information systems MIS Quarterly 30 1-12