The objective of this study was to compare the radiation exposure
delivered by helical CT and pulmonary angiography (PA) for the
detection of pulmonary embolism (PE), with an anthropomorphic
phantom. A preliminary survey defined a representative standard
procedure for helical CT and PA (n=148) by choosing the exposure settings most
frequently used. Then, radiation doses were measured with
thermoluminescent dosimeters TLD 100 (Lif) introduced into the depth
of an anthropomorphic phantom. Average doses were approximately five
times smaller with helical CT than with PA (6.4±1.5 and 28±7.6 mGy,
respectively). The most important doses were abreast the pulmonary
apex for CT, and abreast the pulmonary arteries for PA. Compared
with PA, helical CT dose distribution was relatively uniform
(10–13 mGy). Finally, concerning abdomen and pelvis, doses were more
important for PA than for CT scan (0.06–2.86 and 0.2–11.5 mGy,
respectively). For the diagnostics of PE, radiation exposure is five
times smaller with helical CT than with pulmonary
angiography.