Impact of saline-based tetrastarch vs balanced tetrastarch and crystalloid solutions on hyperchloraemic acidosis in endotoxaemic sheep

被引:0
|
作者
TG Kampmeier
C Ertmer
S Rehberg
A Morelli
M Lange
C Höhn
H Van Aken
M Westphal
机构
[1] University Hospital of Muenster,
[2] University of Rome 'La Sapienza,undefined
来源
Critical Care | / 14卷 / Suppl 1期
关键词
Mean Arterial Pressure; Lactic Acid Production; Haemodynamic Variable; Arterial pCO2; Crystalloid Solution;
D O I
10.1186/cc8736
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Effects of balanced crystalloid vs. 0.9% saline-based vs. balanced 6% tetrastarch infusion on renal function and tubular integrity in ovine endotoxemic shock
    Ertmer, Christian
    Kampmeier, Tim G.
    Rehberg, Sebastian
    Morelli, Andrea
    Koehler, Gabriele
    Lange, Matthias
    Pinto, Bernardo Bollen
    Hoehn, Cornelia
    Hahnenkamp, Klaus
    Van Aken, Hugo
    Westphal, Martin
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (04) : 783 - 792
  • [2] Comparison of the effects of a balanced crystalloid-based and a saline-based tetrastarch solution on canine whole blood coagulation and platelet function
    Reuteler, Annina
    Axiak-Flammer, Shannon
    Howard, Judith
    Adamik, Katja-Nicole
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 27 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [3] Renal Effects of Saline-based 10% Pentastarch versus 6% Tetrastarch Infusion in Ovine Endotoxemic Shock
    Ertmer, Christian
    Koehler, Gabriele
    Rehberg, Sebastian
    Morelli, Andrea
    Lange, Matthias
    Ellger, Bjoern
    Pinto, Bernardo Bollen
    Ruebig, Eva
    Erren, Michael
    Fischer, Lars G.
    Van Aken, Hugo
    Westphal, Martin
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (04) : 936 - 947
  • [4] Renal Effects of Saline-based 10% Pentastarch versus 6% Tetrastarch Infusion in Ovine Endotoxemic Shock (vol 112, pg 936, 2010)
    Ertmer, C.
    Koehler, G.
    Rehberg, S.
    Morelli, A.
    Lange, M.
    Ellger, B.
    Pinto, B. B.
    Ruebig, E.
    Erren, M.
    Fischer, L. G.
    Van Aken, H.
    Westphal, M.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 122 (04) : 958 - 958
  • [5] Evaluation of the Distribution and Elimination of Balanced Isotonic Crystalloid, 5% Hypertonic Saline, and 6% Tetrastarch 130/0.4 Using Volume Kinetic Modeling and Analysis in Healthy Conscious Cats
    Yiew, Xiu Ting
    Bateman, Shane W.
    Hahn, Robert G.
    Bersenas, Alexa M. E.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [6] The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients
    Wilkes, NJ
    Woolf, R
    Mutch, M
    Mallett, SV
    Peachey, T
    Stephens, R
    Mythen, MG
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (04): : 811 - 816
  • [7] A head-to-head comparison of in vitro coagulation effects of saline-based and balanced electrolyte crystalloid and colloid intravenous fluids
    Roche, AM
    James, MFM
    Bennett-Guerrero, E
    Mythen, MG
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (04): : 1274 - 1279
  • [8] Coagulation and biochemical effects of balanced salt-based high molecular weight vs saline-based low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch solutions during the anhepatic period of liver transplantation
    Ahn, H. J.
    Yang, M.
    Gwak, M. S.
    Koo, M. S.
    Bang, S. R.
    Kim, G. S.
    Lee, S. K.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [9] Effects of Balanced Versus Saline-based Solutions on Acute Kidney Injury in Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Nam, Jae-Sik
    Kim, Wook-Jong
    Seo, Wan-Woo
    Lee, Sang-Wook
    Joung, Kyung-Woon
    Chin, Ji-Hyun
    Choi, Dae-Kee
    Choi, In-Cheol
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2024, 38 (09) : 1923 - 1931
  • [10] The intraoperative therapeutic equivalence of balanced vs saline-based 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and their influence on perioperative acid-base status and renal functions
    Helmy, Ahmed
    Mukhtar, Ahmed
    Ahmed, Abeer
    Sief, Nazmy Edward
    Hussein, Amr
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 32 : 267 - 273