A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union

被引:0
|
作者
Julie Glanville
Sarah King
Francisco Guarner
Colin Hill
Mary Ellen Sanders
机构
[1] York Health Economics Consortium LTD,Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre
[2] University Hospital Vall d’Hebron,undefined
[3] University College Cork,undefined
[4] Dairy & Food Culture Technologies,undefined
关键词
Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Probiotics; EFSA; Regulatory; Health claims;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper addresses the use of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the strength of evidence for health benefits of probiotic foods, especially relating to health claim substantiation in the European Union. A systematic review is a protocol-driven, transparent and replicable approach, widely accepted in a number of scientific fields, and used by many policy-setting organizations to evaluate the strength of evidence to answer a focused research question. Many systematic reviews have been published on the broad category of probiotics for many different outcomes. Some of these reviews have been criticized for including poor quality studies, pooling heterogeneous study results, and not considering publication bias. Well-designed and -conducted systematic reviews should address such issues. Systematic reviews of probiotics have an additional challenge – rarely addressed in published reviews - in that there must be a scientifically sound basis for combining evidence on different strains, species or genera. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is increasingly adopting the systematic review methodology. It remains to be seen how health claims supported by systematic reviews are evaluated within the EFSA approval process. The EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies deems randomized trials to be the best approach to generating evidence about the effects of foods on health outcomes. They also acknowledge that systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) are the best approach to assess the totality of the evidence. It is reasonable to use these well-established methods to assess objectively the strength of evidence for a probiotic health claim. Use of the methods to combine results on more than a single strain or defined blend of strains will require a rationale that the different probiotics are substantively similar, either in identity or in their mode of action.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union
    Glanville, Julie
    King, Sarah
    Guarner, Francisco
    Hill, Colin
    Sanders, Mary Ellen
    NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2015, 14
  • [2] Scientific evidence and functional foods: health claims regulation in the European Union
    Mas, Roberto Lopez
    POLITICA Y SOCIEDAD, 2021, 58 (03):
  • [3] Migrant health literacy in the European Union: A systematic literature review
    Ward, Markia
    Kristiansen, Maria
    Sorensen, Kristine
    HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2019, 78 (01) : 81 - 95
  • [4] A systematic review of probiotic use to improve metabolic health in women
    Byrne, David F.
    Geraghty, Aisling A.
    Killeen, Sarah Louise
    McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2020, 79 (OCE2) : E656 - E656
  • [5] Promoting sexual health in schools: a systematic review of the European evidence
    Abrams, Ronja
    Nordmyr, Johanna
    Forsman, Anna K.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [6] Impact of organic foods on chronic diseases and health perception: a systematic review of the evidence
    Poulia, Kalliopi-Anna
    Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia
    Alevizou, Myrto
    Papakonstantinou, Emilia
    Zampelas, Antonis
    Chourdakis, Michail
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2025, 79 (02) : 90 - 103
  • [7] Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: A systematic review of empirical evidence
    Ondřej Dvouletý
    Stjepan Srhoj
    Smaranda Pantea
    Small Business Economics, 2021, 57 : 243 - 263
  • [8] Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: A systematic review of empirical evidence
    Dvoulety, Ondrej
    Srhoj, Stjepan
    Pantea, Smaranda
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 57 (01) : 243 - 263
  • [9] HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review
    Desai, S.
    Tavoschi, L.
    Sullivan, A. K.
    Combs, L.
    Raben, D.
    Delpech, V.
    Jakobsen, S. F.
    Amato-Gauci, A. J.
    Croxford, S.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (03) : 163 - 179
  • [10] Defining Nonmedical Use of Prescription Opioids Within Health Care Claims: A Systematic Review
    Cochran, Gerald
    Woo, Bongki
    Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan
    Gordon, Adam J.
    Donohue, Julie M.
    Gellad, Walid F.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2015, 36 (02) : 192 - 202