A survey of decision making in adversarial games

被引:0
|
作者
Xiuxian Li
Min Meng
Yiguang Hong
Jie Chen
机构
[1] Tongji University,College of Electronics and Information Engineering
[2] Shanghai Research Institute for Intelligent Autonomous Systems,undefined
来源
关键词
adversarial games; zero-sum games; Stackelberg games; differential games; Nash equilibrium; correlated equilibrium; regret;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In many practical applications, such as poker, chess, drug interdiction, cybersecurity, and national defense, players often have adversarial stances, i.e., the selfish actions of each player inevitably or intentionally inflict loss or wreak havoc on other players. Therefore, adversarial games are important in real-world applications. However, only special adversarial games, such as Bayesian games, are reviewed in the literature. In this respect, this study aims to provide a systematic survey of three main game models widely employed in adversarial games, i.e., zero-sum normal-form and extensive-form games, Stackelberg (security) games, and zero-sum differential games, from an array of perspectives, including basic knowledge of game models, (approximate) equilibrium concepts, problem classifications, research frontiers, (approximate) optimal strategy-seeking techniques, prevailing algorithms, and practical applications. Finally, promising future research directions are also discussed for relevant adversarial games.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A survey of decision making in adversarial games
    Li, Xiuxian
    Meng, Min
    Hong, Yiguang
    Chen, Jie
    SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2024, 67 (04)
  • [2] A survey of decision making in adversarial games
    Xiuxian LI
    Min MENG
    Yiguang HONG
    Jie CHEN
    ScienceChina(InformationSciences), 2024, 67 (04) : 85 - 112
  • [3] On the Complexity of Adversarial Decision Making
    Foster, Dylan J.
    Rakhlin, Alexander
    Sekhari, Ayush
    Sridharan, Karthik
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 35 (NEURIPS 2022), 2022,
  • [4] Decision Making and Games with Vector Outcomes
    Park, Jaeok
    B E JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 20 (01):
  • [5] Knowledge Management of Games for Decision Making
    Roungas, Bill
    Meijer, Sebastiaan
    Verbraeck, Alexander
    SIMULATION GAMING: APPLICATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SMART INFRASTRUCTURES, 2018, 10825 : 24 - 33
  • [6] Collective decision making and paradoxical games
    Parrondo, J. M. R.
    Dinis, L.
    Garcia-Torano, E.
    Sotillo, B.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2007, 143 (1): : 39 - 46
  • [7] Collective decision making and paradoxical games
    J. M.R. Parrondo
    L. Dinis
    E. García-Toraño
    B. Sotillo
    The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 2007, 143 : 39 - 46
  • [8] Games for Cybersecurity Decision-Making
    Hussain, Atif
    Kuhn, Kristen
    Shaikh, Siraj Ahmed
    HCI IN GAMES, HCI-GAMES 2020, 2020, 12211 : 411 - 423
  • [9] Epistemic considerations of decision making in games
    Kaneko, M
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1999, 38 (02) : 105 - 137
  • [10] Experimental Games and Social Decision Making
    van Dijk, Eric
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 72, 2021, 72 : 415 - 438