Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks with Logistic Regression for Detection of Obesity

被引:0
|
作者
Seyed Taghi Heydari
Seyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi
Najaf Zare
机构
[1] Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine
来源
关键词
Artificial neural network; Logistic regression; Obesity; Classification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Obesity is a common problem in nutrition, both in the developed and developing countries. The aim of this study was to classify obesity by artificial neural networks and logistic regression. This cross-sectional study comprised of 414 healthy military personnel in southern Iran. All subjects completed questionnaires on their socio-economic status and their anthropometric measures were measured by a trained nurse. Classification of obesity was done by artificial neural networks and logistic regression. The mean age±SD of participants was 34.4 ± 7.5 years. A total of 187 (45.2%) were obese. In regard to logistic regression and neural networks the respective values were 80.2% and 81.2% when correctly classified, 80.2 and 79.7 for sensitivity and 81.9 and 83.7 for specificity; while the area under Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.888 and 0.884 and the Kappa statistic were 0.600 and 0.629 for logistic regression and neural networks model respectively. We conclude that the neural networks and logistic regression both were good classifier for obesity detection but they were not significantly different in classification.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2454
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks with Logistic Regression for Detection of Obesity
    Heydari, Seyed Taghi
    Ayatollahi, Seyed Mohammad Taghi
    Zare, Najaf
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (04) : 2449 - 2454
  • [2] Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks with Logistic Regression in Prediction of Kidney Transplant Outcomes
    Shadabi, Fariba
    Sharma, Dharmendra
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 543 - 547
  • [3] Mineral favorability mapping: A comparison of artificial neural networks, logistic regression, and discriminant analysis
    Harris D.
    Pan G.
    Natural Resources Research, 1999, 8 (2) : 93 - 109
  • [4] Comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression in prediction of gallbladder disease among obese patients
    Liew, P-L
    Lee, Y-C
    Lin, Y-C
    Lee, T-S
    Lee, W-J
    Wang, W.
    Chien, C-W
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (04) : 356 - 362
  • [5] Predicting the type of pregnancy using artificial neural networks and multinomial logistic regression: a comparison study
    Sadat-Hashemi, SM
    Kazemnejad, A
    Lucas, C
    Badie, K
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2005, 14 (03): : 198 - 202
  • [6] Predicting the type of pregnancy using artificial neural networks and multinomial logistic regression: a comparison study
    Seyed Mehdi Sadat-Hashemi
    Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
    Caro Lucas
    Kambiz Badie
    Neural Computing & Applications, 2005, 14 : 198 - 202
  • [7] Enrollment Management Model: Artificial Neural Networks versus Logistic Regression
    Gerasimovic, Milica
    Bugaric, Ugljesa
    APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 32 (02) : 153 - 164
  • [8] Neural Networks & Logistic Regression for FPGA Hardware Trojan Detection
    Pazira, Milad
    Baleghi, Yasser
    Mahmoodpour, Mohammad-Ali
    Jafari, Hossein
    2023 5th Iranian International Conference on Microelectronics, IICM 2023, 2023, : 82 - 85
  • [9] Neural networks & logistic regression for FPGA hardware Trojan detection
    Pazira, Milad
    Baleghi, Yasser
    Mahmoodpour, Mohammad-Ali
    Jafari, Hossein
    2023 5TH IRANIAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROELECTRONICS, IICM, 2023, : 82 - 85
  • [10] Comparison of the Performance of Log-logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Breast Cancer Relapse
    Faradmal, Javad
    Soltanian, Ali Reza
    Roshanaei, Ghodratollah
    Khodabakhshi, Reza
    Kasaeian, Amir
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (14) : 5883 - 5888