The Coleman–Shapley index: being decisive within the coalition of the interested

被引:0
|
作者
André Casajus
Frank Huettner
机构
[1] HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management,
[2] Dr. Hops Craft Beer Bar,undefined
[3] ESMT European School of Management and Technology,undefined
来源
Public Choice | 2019年 / 181卷
关键词
Decomposition; Shapley value; Shapley–Shubik index; Power index; Coleman power of a collectivity to act; Penrose–Banzhaf index; EU Council; UN Security Council; C71; D60; 91A12;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Coleman power of a collectivity to act (CPCA) is a popular statistic that reflects the ability of a committee to pass a proposal. Applying the Shapley value to that measure, we derive a new power index—the Coleman–Shapley index (CSI)—indicating each voter’s contribution to the CPCA. The CSI is characterized by four axioms: anonymity, the null voter property, the transfer property, and a property stipulating that the sum of the voters’ power equals the CPCA. Similar to the Shapley–Shubik index (SSI) and the Penrose–Banzhaf index (PBI), our new index reflects the expectation of being a pivotal voter. Here, the coalitional formation model underlying the CPCA and the PBI is combined with the ordering approach underlying the SSI. In contrast to the SSI, voters are ordered not according to their agreement with a potential bill, but according to their vested interest in it. Among the most interested voters, power is then measured in a way similar to the PBI. Although we advocate the CSI over the PBI so as to capture a voter’s influence on whether a proposal passes, our index gives new meaning to the PBI. The CSI is a decomposer of the PBI, splitting the PBI into a voter’s power as such and the voter’s impact on the power of the other voters by threatening to block any proposal. We apply our index to the EU Council and the UN Security Council.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 289
页数:14
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] The Coleman-Shapley index: being decisive within the coalition of the interested
    Casajus, Andre
    Huettner, Frank
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2019, 181 (3-4) : 275 - 289
  • [2] DIFFERENTIAL PAYMENTS WITHIN A BIDDER COALITION AND THE SHAPLEY VALUE
    GRAHAM, DA
    MARSHALL, RC
    RICHARD, JF
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1990, 80 (03): : 493 - 510
  • [3] A characterization and some properties of the Banzhaf-Coleman-Dubey-Shapley sensitivity index
    Barua, R
    Chakravarty, SR
    Roy, S
    Sarkar, P
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2004, 49 (01) : 31 - 48
  • [4] Banzhaf–Coleman–Dubey–Shapley sensitivity index for simple multichoice voting games
    Bertrand Mbama Engoulou
    Pierre Wambo
    Lawrence Diffo Lambo
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 328 : 1349 - 1364
  • [5] Banzhaf-Coleman-Dubey-Shapley sensitivity index for simple multichoice voting games
    Engoulou, Bertrand Mbama
    Wambo, Pierre
    Lambo, Lawrence Diffo
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 328 (02) : 1349 - 1364
  • [6] ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF THE AVERAGE TIME OF BEDS BEING UNOCCUPIED AS AN INDEX OF THE EMPLOYED CAPACITY OF BEDS WITHIN A HOSPITAL
    BLEY, WR
    HEILMANN, HP
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE MEDIZIN-ZKM, 1985, 40 (13): : 999 - 1001
  • [7] Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries
    Sischka, Philipp E.
    Martin, Gina
    Residori, Caroline
    Hammami, Nour
    Page, Nicholas
    Schnohr, Christina
    Cosma, Alina
    ASSESSMENT, 2025,