Boundary-spanning in emerging technology research: determinants of funding success for academic scientists

被引:0
|
作者
Julia Melkers
Fang Xiao
机构
[1] Georgia Institute of Technology,School of Public Policy
[2] Georgia State University,Andrew Young School of Public Policy
来源
关键词
Emerging technologies; Interdisciplinarity; University-industry; O31; O32;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Emerging technologies, including nanotechnologies, are generally seen as those latest scientific innovations which have a potential impact on industry structure, and commercialization and economic potential. Work in this area of emerging technologies has distinct boundary spanning characteristics from the perspective of academic science. First, many emerging technologies involve collaboration of scientists across disciplinary boundaries. Second, because of the commercializability of many emerging technologies, scientists may interact more often with industry throughout the research and commercialization process. We ask, what are the boundary-spanning characteristics of scientists engaged in emerging technology research and how do those characteristics matter in obtaining funding in this area? We examine the characteristics of academic scientists in the United States who are employed in research intensive institutions and who are engaged in funded research in the area of emerging technologies. We address the factors that predict their grant success in areas of emerging technology. Findings reveal that interdisciplinary activities and industry orientation are both important in predicting funding in areas of emerging technology. Moreover, the findings imply that the emergence of new technologies may offer opportunities for women in low representation fields.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 270
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Boundary-spanning in emerging technology research: determinants of funding success for academic scientists
    Melkers, Julia
    Xiao, Fang
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2012, 37 (03): : 251 - 270
  • [2] Boundary-spanning in academic healthcare organisations
    Lander, Bryn
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (08) : 36 - 45
  • [3] Boundary-spanning leadership as a necessity for academic administrators
    Zare, Mohsen Nazarzadeh
    Khorasgani, Maryam Sadat Ghoraishi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (04) : 527 - 540
  • [4] Family Business Research as a Boundary-Spanning Platform
    Holt, Daniel T.
    Pearson, Allison W.
    Payne, G. Tyge
    Sharma, Pramodita
    FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 31 (01) : 14 - 31
  • [5] Community Engagement and Boundary-Spanning Roles at Research Libraries
    Weerts, David J.
    Sandmann, Lorilee R.
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 81 (06): : 632 - +
  • [6] Hybrid social media: employees' use of a boundary-spanning technology
    Archer-Brown, Chris
    Marder, Ben
    Calvard, Thomas
    Kowalski, Tina
    NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2018, 33 (01) : 74 - 93
  • [7] Bridging distances:: Organizing boundary-spanning technology development projects
    Bengtsson, M
    Söderholm, A
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2002, 36 (03) : 263 - 274
  • [8] BOUNDARY-SPANNING ACTIVITY AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT - COMPARATIVE STUDY
    KELLER, RT
    HOLLAND, WE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1975, 22 (04) : 130 - 133
  • [9] Teams' boundary-spanning capacity at university: Performance of technology projects in commercialization
    Taheri, Mozhdeh
    van Geenhuizen, Marina
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 111 : 31 - 43
  • [10] An Investigation of Interpersonal Ties in Interorganizational Exchanges in Emerging Markets: A Boundary-Spanning Perspective
    Huang, Ying
    Luo, Yadong
    Liu, Yi
    Yang, Qian
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 42 (06) : 1557 - 1587