Benchmarking Monte-Carlo dose calculation for MLC CyberKnife treatments

被引:6
|
作者
Mackeprang P.-H. [1 ]
Vuong D. [1 ]
Volken W. [1 ]
Henzen D. [1 ]
Schmidhalter D. [1 ]
Malthaner M. [1 ]
Mueller S. [1 ]
Frei D. [1 ]
Kilby W. [2 ]
Aebersold D.M. [1 ]
Fix M.K. [1 ]
Manser P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern
[2] Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA
关键词
Benchmarking; CyberKnife; Dose calculation; Monte Carlo; QA; TPS;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-019-1370-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vendor-independent Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation (IDC) for patient-specific quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) based CyberKnife treatments is used to benchmark and validate the commercial MC dose calculation engine for MLC based treatments built into the CyberKnife treatment planning system (Precision MC). Methods: The benchmark included dose profiles in water in 15 mm depth and depth dose curves of rectangular MLC shaped fields ranging from 7.6 mm × 7.7 mm to 115.0 mm × 100.1 mm, which were compared between IDC, Precision MC and measurements in terms of dose difference and distance to agreement. Dose distributions of three phantom cases and seven clinical lung cases were calculated using both IDC and Precision MC. The lung PTVs ranged from 14 cm3 to 93 cm3. Quantitative comparison of these dose distributions was performed using dose-volume parameters and 3D gamma analysis with 2% global dose difference and 1 mm distance criteria and a global 10% dose threshold. Time to calculate dose distributions was recorded and efficiency was assessed. Results: Absolute dose profiles in 15 mm depth in water showed agreement between Precision MC and IDC within 3.1% or 1 mm. Depth dose curves agreed within 2.3% / 1 mm. For the phantom and clinical lung cases, mean PTV doses differed from - 1.0 to + 2.3% between IDC and Precision MC and gamma passing rates were > =98.1% for all multiple beam treatment plans. For the lung cases, lung V20 agreed within ±1.5%. Calculation times ranged from 2.2 min (for 39 cm3 PTV at 1.0 × 1.0 × 2.5 mm3 native CT resolution) to 8.1 min (93 cm3 at 1.1 × 1.1 × 1.0 mm3), at 2% uncertainty for Precision MC for the 7 examined lung cases and 4-6 h for IDC, which, however, is not optimized for efficiency but used as a gold standard for accuracy. Conclusions: Both accuracy and efficiency of Precision MC in the context of MLC based planning for the CyberKnife M6 system were benchmarked against MC based IDC framework. Precision MC is used in clinical practice at our institute. © 2019 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking of Monte Carlo dose calculation for MLC based CyberKnife Radiotherapy
    Mackeprang, P. H.
    Vuong, D.
    Volken, W.
    Henzen, D.
    Schmidhalter, D.
    Malthaner, M.
    Mueller, S.
    Frei, D.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Fix, M. K.
    Manser, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S994 - S995
  • [2] Independent Monte-Carlo dose calculation for MLC based CyberKnife radiotherapy
    Mackeprang, P-H
    Vuong, D.
    Volken, W.
    Henzen, D.
    Schmidhalter, D.
    Malthaner, M.
    Mueller, S.
    Frei, D.
    Stampanoni, M. F. M.
    Dal Pra, A.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Fix, M. K.
    Manser, P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01):
  • [3] Assessing accuracy and efficiency of Monte Carlo based dose calculation for MLC CyberKnife treatments
    Mackeprang, P. -H.
    Volken, W.
    Henzen, D.
    Schmidhalter, D.
    Malthaner, M.
    Mueller, S.
    Frei, D.
    Kilby, W.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Fix, M. K.
    Manser, P.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (06) : 597 - 597
  • [4] Implementation of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for CyberKnife treatment planning
    Ma, C-M
    Li, J. S.
    Deng, J.
    Fan, J.
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MONTE CARLO TECHNIQUES IN RADIOTHERAPY DELIVERY AND VERIFICATION - THIRD MCGILL INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP, 2008, 102
  • [5] MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF ABSORBED DOSE IN XEROMAMMOGRAPHY
    DANCE, DR
    BAKER, AM
    DAVIS, R
    STACEY, AJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (04): : 760 - 760
  • [6] Use of VirtuaLinac to Perform Monte-Carlo Based Dose Calculation for Verification of Radiotherapy Treatments On a Jawless Ring Gantry Linac with Double Stack MLC
    Sethi, A.
    Ji, Z.
    Liu, R.
    Laugeman, E.
    Sawkey, D.
    Zhao, T.
    Mutic, S.
    Hugo, G.
    Cai, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E872 - E873
  • [7] validation of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for CyberKnife multileaf collimator
    Gondre, M.
    Marsolat, F.
    Bourhis, J.
    Bochud, F.
    Moeckli, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1362 - S1363
  • [8] Validation of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for CyberKnife multileaf collimator
    Gondre, Maude
    Marsolat, Fanny
    Bourhis, Jean
    Bochud, Francois
    Moeckli, Raphael
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):
  • [9] Comparison of the accuracy of Monte Carlo and Ray Tracing dose calculation algorithms for multiple target brain treatments on CyberKnife
    Godfrey Mukwada
    Malgorzata Skorska
    Pejman Rowshanfarzad
    Martin A. Ebert
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2023, 46 : 1477 - 1487
  • [10] Comparison of the accuracy of Monte Carlo and Ray Tracing dose calculation algorithms for multiple target brain treatments on CyberKnife
    Mukwada, Godfrey
    Skorska, Malgorzata
    Rowshanfarzad, Pejman
    Ebert, Martin A.
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2023, 46 (04) : 1477 - 1487