Radionuclide Imaging in Decision-Making for Coronary Revascularization in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

被引:2
|
作者
Wiefels C. [1 ]
Erthal F. [2 ,3 ]
deKemp R.A. [4 ]
Chong A.Y. [4 ]
Mielniczuk L.M. [4 ]
Mesquita C.T. [1 ]
Beanlands R.S.B. [4 ,5 ]
Promislow S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro
[2] Casa de Saude São Jose, Rio de Janeiro
[3] Fonte Imagem, Rio de Janeiro
[4] Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa
[5] Division of Cardiology, National Cardiac PET Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Room 3409, Ottawa
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Coronary artery disease; Coronary revascularization; Myocardial viability; Nuclear imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s12410-018-9458-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of the Review: This review will discuss the current nuclear imaging techniques for defining ischemia and hibernation/viability, their advantages and disadvantages, and the data related to their use to direct revascularization decisions. Recent Findings: Recent interventional trials highlight the importance of functional imaging in trying to determine who may benefit from revascularization. Outcome benefit from revascularization has previously been shown in patients with significant ischemia, and flow quantification from positron emission tomography (PET) may allow for further risk stratification; similar data may soon be available with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as well using the newer cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras. Some degree of equipoise still exists regarding the utilization of myocardial viability to guide revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, with recent studies presenting conflicting results. Summary: There is a niche for radionuclide imaging in helping to guide revascularization decision-making, and advances in recent years are providing new mechanisms by which we may better clarify the particular circumstances in which it can and should be applied. However, most data at this time is limited to observational cohorts and inferences from other randomized trials. The results of upcoming trials like ISCHEMIA and AIMI-HF will hopefully provide the needed evidence to support current clinical practice, or may change our algorithms altogether. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A National Survey of Decision-Making in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Knowledge and Perspectives on Coronary Revascularization
    Wong, John B.
    Couper, Mick P.
    Levin, Carrie
    Van Hoewyk, John
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A368 - A369
  • [2] Decision-making in end-stage coronary artery disease: Revascularization or heart transplantation?
    Hausmann, H
    Topp, H
    Siniawski, H
    Holz, S
    Hetzer, R
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (05): : 1296 - 1301
  • [3] Medical Decision-Making and Revascularization in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
    Chang, Alex J.
    Liang, Yilin
    Hamilton, Steven A.
    Ambrosy, Andrew P.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 108 (03) : 553 - 566
  • [4] Imaging as a basis of clinical decision-making in congenital and coronary disease and heart failure
    Luscher, Thomas F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (15) : 1171 - 1173
  • [5] The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease
    Head, Stuart J.
    Kaul, Sanjay
    Mack, Michael J.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Taggart, David P.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Leon, Martin B.
    Marco, Jean
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (32) : 2510 - +
  • [6] The modified heart team protocol facilitated the revascularization decision-making quality in complex coronary artery disease
    Ma, Hanping
    Lin, Shen
    Li, Xi
    Wang, Yang
    Yang, Weixian
    Dou, Kefei
    Liu, Sheng
    Zheng, Zhe
    Modified Heart Team Protocol Study Group, Yunpeng
    INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2025, 40 (02):
  • [7] Decision-making in end-stage coronary artery disease: Revascularization or heart transplantation? Invited commentary
    Alderman, EL
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 64 (05): : 1302 - 1302
  • [8] μ QFR in ASET Pilot Studies: More Assets in the decision-making process for stable ischemic heart disease
    Gonzalez-Urbistondo, Francisco
    Alperi, Alberto
    Moris, Cesar
    Avanzas, Pablo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 403
  • [9] Coronary Revascularization in High-Risk Stable Patients With Significant Comorbidities: Challenges in Decision-Making
    Schulman-Marcus J.
    Peterson K.
    Banerjee R.
    Samy S.
    Yager N.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2019, 21 (1)
  • [10] Revascularization for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: The Beat Goes On
    Weintraub, William S.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 40 : 48 - 49