Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods

被引:0
|
作者
Debbie Collins
机构
[1] National Centre for Social Research,
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2003年 / 12卷
关键词
Cognitive aspects of survey methodology; Cognitive interviews; Data quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article puts forward the case that survey questionnaires, which are a type of measuring instrument, can and should be tested to ensure they meet their purpose. Traditionally survey researchers have been pre-occupied with 'standardising' data collection instruments and procedures such as question wording and have assumed that experience in questionnaire design, coupled with pilot testing of questionnaires, will then ensure valid and reliable results. However, implicit in the notion of standardisation are the assumptions that respondents are able to understand the questions being asked, that questions are understood in the same way by all respondents, and that respondents are willing and able to answer such questions. The development of cognitive question testing methods has provided social researchers with a number of theories and tools to test these assumptions, and to develop better survey instruments and questionnaires. This paper describes some of these theories and tools, and argues that cognitive testing should be a standard part of the development process of any survey instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
    Collins, D
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [2] The American time use survey: Cognitive pretesting
    Schwartz, LK
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 2002, 125 (02) : 34 - 44
  • [3] Comparing Traditional and Crowdsourcing Methods for Pretesting Survey Questions
    Edgar, Jennifer
    Murphy, Joe
    Keating, Michael
    SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (04):
  • [4] Pretesting and cognitive interviewing are integral parts in translation of survey instrument
    Mondal, Himel
    Mondal, Shaikat
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 59 (02) : 251 - 252
  • [5] SURVEY PRETESTING - DO DIFFERENT METHODS PRODUCE DIFFERENT RESULTS
    PRESSER, S
    BLAIR, J
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 1994, VOL 24, 1994, 24 : 73 - 104
  • [6] Degree of cognitive interviewer involvement in questionnaire pretesting on trending survey modes
    Mohorko, Anja
    Hiebec, Valentina
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 62 : 79 - 89
  • [7] Cognitive pretesting and the developmental validity of child self-report instruments: Theory and applications
    Woolley, ME
    Bowen, GL
    Bowen, NK
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2004, 14 (03) : 191 - 200
  • [8] Response to "Pretesting and cognitive interviewing are integral parts in translation of survey instrument"
    Zieger, Aron
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 59 (02) : 253 - 253
  • [9] RETROSPECTIVE PRETESTING IN COGNITIVE DOMAIN
    RIPPEY, RM
    GELLER, LM
    KING, DW
    EVALUATION QUARTERLY, 1978, 2 (03): : 481 - 491
  • [10] An overview on observational instruments and measuring methods for dewfall
    Zhang, Qiang
    Hao, XiaoCui
    Wen, XiaoMei
    Wang, Sheng
    Zeng, Jian
    SCIENCES IN COLD AND ARID REGIONS, 2011, 3 (01): : 78 - 85