Biology, fishery, conservation and management of Indian Ocean tuna fisheries

被引:21
|
作者
N. Gopalakrishna Pillai
Palanisamy Satheeshkumar
机构
[1] Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute,
关键词
conservation; fisheries; management; ocean ecosystem; recruitment; tuna;
D O I
10.1007/s12601-012-0038-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The focus of the study is to explore the recent trend of the world tuna fishery with special reference to the Indian Ocean tuna fisheries and its conservation and sustainable management. In the Indian Ocean, tuna catches have increased rapidly from about 179959 t in 1980 to about 832246 t in 1995. They have continued to increase up to 2005; the catch that year was 1201465 t, forming about 26% of the world catch. Since 2006 onwards there has been a decline in the volume of catches and in 2008 the catch was only 913625 t. The Principal species caught in the Indian Ocean are skipjack and yellowfin. Western Indian Ocean contributed 78.2% and eastern Indian Ocean 21.8% of the total tuna production from the Indian Ocean. The Indian Ocean stock is currently overfished and IOTC has made some recommendations for management regulations aimed at sustaining the tuna stock. Fishing operations can cause ecological impacts of different types: by catches, damage of the habitat, mortalities caused by lost or discarded gear, pollution, generation of marine debris, etc. Periodic reassessment of the tuna potential is also required with adequate inputs from exploratory surveys as well as commercial landings and this may prevent any unsustainable trends in the development of the tuna fishing industry in the Indian Ocean.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 433
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Equitable pathways for sustainable tuna fisheries management in the Indian Ocean
    Tidd, Alex
    Guillotreau, Patrice
    Fu, Dan
    Mosqueira, Iago
    Dagorn, Laurent
    Capello, Manuela
    MARINE POLICY, 2025, 173
  • [2] A review of the biology of bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus, and the fisheries for this species in the Indian Ocean
    Stobberup, KA
    Marsac, F
    Anganuzzi, AA
    INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION, SPECIAL REPORT NO 9, 1998, : 81 - 128
  • [3] A review of the biology of bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus, and the fisheries for this species in the Indian Ocean
    Stobberup, KA
    Marsac, F
    Anganuzzi, AA
    INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION, SPECIAL REPORT 9, 1998, (09): : 81 - 128
  • [4] Spatial management of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries: potential and perspectives
    Kaplan, David M.
    Chassot, Emmanuel
    Amande, Justin M.
    Dueri, Sibylle
    Demarcq, Herve
    Dagorn, Laurent
    Fonteneau, Alain
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 71 (07) : 1728 - 1749
  • [5] FISHERIES MANAGEMENT IN THE GULF OF MEXICO - IMPACT OF THE TUNA EXCEPTION TO THE FISHERY CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1976
    PEDIGO, DF
    LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1982, 42 (02): : 705 - 723
  • [6] The Firm's Management in Production: Management, Firm, and Time Effects in an Indian Ocean Tuna Fishery
    Wolff, Francois-Charles
    Squires, Dale
    Guillotreau, Patrice
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 95 (03) : 547 - 567
  • [7] Associated species to industrial tuna fisheries in the Indian Ocean
    Stretta, JM
    de Molina, AD
    Ariz, J
    Domalain, G
    Santana, JC
    TUNA PROSPECTS AND STRATEGIES FOR THE INDIAN OCEAN, 1998, : 369 - +
  • [8] Cetacean bycatch in Indian Ocean tuna gillnet fisheries
    Anderson, R. Charles
    Herrera, Miguel
    Ilangakoon, Anoukchika D.
    Koya, K. M.
    Moazzam, M.
    Mustika, Putu L.
    Sutaria, Dipani N.
    ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH, 2020, 41 : 39 - 53
  • [9] Evaluating ecological tradeoffs in fisheries management:: a study case for the yellowfin tuna fishery in the Eastern Pacific Ocean
    Enriquéz-Andrade, RR
    Vaca-Rodríguez, JG
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (03) : 303 - 315
  • [10] Second-guessing uncertainty: Scenario planning for management of the Indian Ocean tuna purse seine fishery
    Davies, Tim K.
    Mees, Chris C.
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 62 : 169 - 177