Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps

被引:0
|
作者
Eric R. Anschuetz
Bobak T. Kiani
机构
[1] MIT Center for Theoretical Physics,
[2] MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the most important properties of classical neural networks is how surprisingly trainable they are, though their training algorithms typically rely on optimizing complicated, nonconvex loss functions. Previous results have shown that unlike the case in classical neural networks, variational quantum models are often not trainable. The most studied phenomenon is the onset of barren plateaus in the training landscape of these quantum models, typically when the models are very deep. This focus on barren plateaus has made the phenomenon almost synonymous with the trainability of quantum models. Here, we show that barren plateaus are only a part of the story. We prove that a wide class of variational quantum models—which are shallow, and exhibit no barren plateaus—have only a superpolynomially small fraction of local minima within any constant energy from the global minimum, rendering these models untrainable if no good initial guess of the optimal parameters is known. We also study the trainability of variational quantum algorithms from a statistical query framework, and show that noisy optimization of a wide variety of quantum models is impossible with a sub-exponential number of queries. Finally, we numerically confirm our results on a variety of problem instances. Though we exclude a wide variety of quantum algorithms here, we give reason for optimism for certain classes of variational algorithms and discuss potential ways forward in showing the practical utility of such algorithms.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps
    Anschuetz, Eric R.
    Kiani, Bobak T.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [2] Barren plateaus swamped with traps
    Nemkov, Nikita A.
    Kiktenko, Evgeniy O.
    Fedorov, Aleksey K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2025, 111 (01)
  • [3] Variational quantum algorithms
    Cerezo, M.
    Arrasmith, Andrew
    Babbush, Ryan
    Benjamin, Simon C.
    Endo, Suguru
    Fujii, Keisuke
    McClean, Jarrod R.
    Mitarai, Kosuke
    Yuan, Xiao
    Cincio, Lukasz
    Coles, Patrick J.
    NATURE REVIEWS PHYSICS, 2021, 3 (09) : 625 - 644
  • [4] Variational quantum algorithms
    M. Cerezo
    Andrew Arrasmith
    Ryan Babbush
    Simon C. Benjamin
    Suguru Endo
    Keisuke Fujii
    Jarrod R. McClean
    Kosuke Mitarai
    Xiao Yuan
    Lukasz Cincio
    Patrick J. Coles
    Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3 : 625 - 644
  • [5] Variational Quantum Algorithms in Finance
    Cong, Thanh N. N.
    Thi, Hiep. L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ICICT 2024, VOL 6, 2024, 1002 : 15 - 25
  • [6] Secure Delegated Variational Quantum Algorithms
    Li, Qin
    Quan, Junyu
    Shi, Jinjing
    Zhang, Shichao
    Li, Xuelong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2024, 43 (10) : 3129 - 3142
  • [7] Optimally stopped variational quantum algorithms
    Vinci, Walter
    Shabani, Alireza
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2018, 97 (04)
  • [8] Classically Optimal Variational Quantum Algorithms
    Wurtz J.
    Love P.
    IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 2021, 2
  • [9] Measurement reduction in variational quantum algorithms
    Zhao, Andrew
    Tranter, Andrew
    Kirby, William M.
    Ung, Shu Fay
    Miyake, Akimasa
    Love, Peter J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2020, 101 (06)
  • [10] Fourier expansion in variational quantum algorithms
    Nemkov N.A.
    Kiktenko E.O.
    Fedorov A.K.
    Physical Review A, 2023, 108 (03)