Multi-criteria decision approach for evaluation, ranking, and selection of remediation options: case of polluted groundwater, Kuwait

被引:0
|
作者
Radwan A. Al-Weshah
Yohannes Yihdego
机构
[1] The University of Jordan,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] La Trobe University,Department of Ecology, Environment & Evolution, College of Science, Health & Engineering
[3] Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation (SMEC),undefined
关键词
Water resources; Groundwater remediation; Pump and treat; Artificial recharge; Storage tanks; Desalination plant;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Freshwater groundwater resources at north Kuwait were contaminated by infiltrated oil as well as sea water that was used to fight the oil-well fires during the liberation of Kuwait in 1991. This paper investigates the feasibility of five remediation options to restore the polluted aquifers. These options include: (i) pump and treat of contaminated groundwater; (ii) cleaning the aquifer formation; (iii) construction of additional desalination plant; (iv) constructing additional storage tanks, and (v) development of artificial aquifer recharge schemes. The basis for this assessment study is to supply minimum basic drinking water to Kuwait City at a total rate of 50,000 m3/day in an emergency for up to one year based on essential basic need of 32 liters per capita per day. To compare these options, a decision matrix to select suitable remediation options using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach is developed. The cost was given a relative weight of 20 whereas other criteria are given weight of 10. Based on these MCDA scores, it was found that option 3, namely, establishing an additional water desalination plant, is the most feasible option followed by option 5, artificial recharge of aquifers.
引用
收藏
页码:36039 / 36045
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria decision approach for evaluation, ranking, and selection of remediation options: case of polluted groundwater, Kuwait
    Al-Weshah, Radwan A.
    Yihdego, Yohannes
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (36) : 36039 - 36045
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support the Remediation of Polluted Soils: A Review of Case Studies
    Abrams, Floris
    Hendrickx, Lucas
    Turcanu, Catrinel
    Sweeck, Lieve
    Van Orshoven, Jos
    LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [3] Evaluation of Groundwater Remediation Technologies Based on Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approaches
    Wang, Hao
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Tan, Qian
    Zeng, Yong
    WATER, 2017, 9 (06):
  • [4] Evaluation of desalination and other strategic management options using multi-criteria decision analysis in Kuwait
    Aliewi, Amjad
    El-Sayed, Essam
    Akbar, Adnan
    Hadi, Khaled
    Al-Rashed, Muhammad
    DESALINATION, 2017, 413 : 40 - 51
  • [5] A multi-criteria decision approach for ranking unmet needs in healthcare
    Cleemput, Irina
    Devriese, Stephan
    Kohn, Laurence
    Westhovens, Rene
    HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 122 (08) : 878 - 884
  • [6] Evaluation, ranking, and selection of pretreatment methods for the conversion of biomass to biogas using multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Vannarath A.
    Thalla A.K.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2020, 40 (4) : 510 - 525
  • [7] Evaluation of decision trees: a multi-criteria approach
    Osei-Bryson, KM
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (11) : 1933 - 1945
  • [8] Multi-criteria decision aid for product end of life options selection
    Kiritsis, D
    Bufardi, A
    Xirouchakis, P
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2003, : 48 - 53
  • [9] Ranking of office lease options by multi-criteria methods
    Ginevičius R.
    Ginevičius T.
    Gedvilaite D.
    Stasiukynas A.
    Engineering Management in Production and Services, 2016, 8 (04) : 86 - 93
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision support and evaluation of strategies for nuclear remediation management
    Geldermann, Jutta
    Bertsch, Valentin
    Treitz, Martin
    French, Simon
    Papamichail, Konstantinia N.
    Hamalainen, Raimo P.
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (01): : 238 - 251