A Comparative Study of Coronal Mass Ejections with and Without Magnetic Cloud Structure near the Earth: Are All Interplanetary CMEs Flux Ropes?

被引:0
|
作者
J. Zhang
P. Hess
W. Poomvises
机构
[1] George Mason University,School of Physics, Astronomy and Computational Sciences
[2] Catholic University of America,undefined
[3] NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,undefined
来源
Solar Physics | 2013年 / 284卷
关键词
Solar Wind; Coronal Hole; Magnetic Cloud; Flux Rope; Weak Magnetic Field;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An outstanding question concerning interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) is whether all ICMEs have a magnetic flux rope structure. We test this question by studying two different ICMEs, one having a magnetic cloud (MC) showing smooth rotation of magnetic field lines and the other not. The two ICMEs are chosen in such a way that their progenitor CMEs are very similar in remote sensing observations. Both CMEs originated from close to the central meridian directly facing the Earth. Both CMEs were associated with a long-lasting post-eruption loop arcade and appeared as an elliptical halo in coronagraph images, indicating a flux rope origin. We conclude that the difference in the in-situ observation is caused by the geometric selection effect, contributed by the deflection of flux ropes in the inner corona and interplanetary space. The first event had its nose pass through the observing spacecraft; thus, the intrinsic flux rope structure of the CME appeared as a magnetic cloud. On the other hand, the second event had the flank of the flux rope intercept the spacecraft, and it thus did not appear as a magnetic cloud. We further argue that a conspicuous long period of weak magnetic field, low plasma temperature, and density in the second event should correspond to the extended leg portion of the embedded magnetic flux rope, thus validating the scenario of the flank-passing. These observations support the idea that all CMEs arriving at the Earth include flux rope drivers.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 104
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Study of Coronal Mass Ejections with and Without Magnetic Cloud Structure near the Earth: Are All Interplanetary CMEs Flux Ropes?
    Zhang, J.
    Hess, P.
    Poomvises, W.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2013, 284 (01) : 89 - 104
  • [2] Distorted Magnetic Flux Ropes within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections
    Weiss, Andreas J.
    Nieves-Chinchilla, Teresa
    Moestl, Christian
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 975 (02):
  • [3] THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS: ARE ALL REGULAR MAGNETIC CLOUDS FLUX ROPES?
    Jacobs, C.
    Roussev, I. I.
    Lugaz, N.
    Poedts, S.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2009, 695 (02) : L171 - L175
  • [4] Are all coronal mass ejections hollow flux ropes?
    Krall, J.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 657 (01): : 559 - 566
  • [5] Do All Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Have a Magnetic Flux Rope Structure Near 1 au?
    Song, H. Q.
    Zhang, J.
    Cheng, X.
    Li, G.
    Hu, Q.
    Li, L. P.
    Chen, S. J.
    Zheng, R. S.
    Chen, Y.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 901 (02)
  • [6] Partially ejected flux ropes: Implications for interplanetary coronal mass ejections
    Gibson, S. E.
    Fan, Y.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2008, 113 (A9)
  • [7] Coronal mass ejections, magnetic flux ropes, and solar magnetism
    Low, BC
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2001, 106 (A11) : 25141 - 25163
  • [8] Coalescence of Magnetic Flux Ropes Within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: Multi-cases Studies
    Zhao, Yan
    Feng, Hengqiang
    Liu, Qiang
    Zhao, Guoqing
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2019, 7
  • [9] Spatial Position of Magnetic Flux Ropes in Flare Active Regions with and without Coronal Mass Ejections
    I. A. Bakunina
    V. F. Melnikov
    A. V. Shain
    S. A. Kuznetsov
    V. E. Abramov-Maximov
    Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2024, 64 (8) : 1237 - 1249
  • [10] Coronal mass ejections as loss of confinement of kinked magnetic flux ropes
    Fan, Y
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 630 (01): : 543 - 551